Public Comments on Recently Closed Cases

The ACHP invites the public to comment on recently closed cases. Use the filters below to find a recently closed case. You may also view the Section 106 Map to see active cases not yet seeking the public's comments.

Let the ACHP know what you think about recently closed cases.
  1. Maryland

    In 2017, the Memorandum of Agreement Among U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, H.E.L.P. Development Corps., Maryland State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding the Perry Point Enhanced-Use Lease Perry Point, Cecil County, Maryland was executed.

  2. Nationwide
    The Programmatic Agreement Among the Bureau of Land Management, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers Regarding the Manner in Which the BLM Will Meet Its Responsibilities Under the National Historic Preservation Act was executed in February 2012. The nationwide Programmatic Agreement (nPA) governs the BLM's Section 106 compliance activities nationwide and primarily in eleven western states where the BLM administers most of its surface lands and mineral estate.
  3. South Dakota

    In 2020, the Memorandum of Agreement Among Western Area Power Administration, South Dakota State Historic Preservation Officer, Yankton Sioux Tribe, Sweetland Wind Farm. LLC, and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding the Sweetland Wind Project Near Wessington, Hand County, South Dakota was executed. In accordance with VIII, the agreement is being amended to take into account the participation of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in the undertaking.

  4. Washington

    In 2012, the Programmatic Agreement Among the Federal Highway Administration, the U.S. Forest Service the Washington State Department of Transportation, the Washington State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding the Federal-Aid Highway Program in Washington was executed. In accordance with Stipulation 16, signatories are considering an amendment to the agreement.

  5. Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah

    In 2012, the Programmatic Agreement Among the United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, the Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, the Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer, the New Mexico State Historic Preservation Officer, the Nevada State Historic Preservation Officer, the Utah State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding Solar Energy Development on Lands Administered by the Bureau of Land Management was executed.

  6. Virginia

    In 2012, the Programmatic Agreement Among the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration; U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Belvoir; County of Fairfax, VA; Commonwealth of Virginia Virginia Department of Transportation; Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment; Catawaba Indian Nation; National Trust on Historic Preservation; Advisory Council on Historic Preservation; and Virginia State Historic Preservation Officer Regarding Construction of Route 1 Improvements Project in Fairfax County, Virginia was executed.

  7. Nationwide

    In 2021, the National Programmatic Agreement Among the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers for Phasing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for Large-Scale Multi-Year Undertakings was executed. In accordance with Stipulation XIII, the Forest Service is proposing an amendment following the initial results of the first year of a two-year monitoring period.

  8. California

    In 2018, the Programmatic Agreement Among U.S. Department of Energy-Western Power Administration, U.S. Department of Interior-Bureau of Reclamation, California State Historic Preservation Officer, and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding Construction of the San Luis Transmission Project, in Alameda, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Merced Counties, California was executed regarding the construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of a new transmission line.

  9. Hawaii
    In 2011, the "Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Among the Commander Navy Region Hawaii and the Hawaii State Historic Preservation Officer Regarding the MCON Project, P-320, Submarine Production Support Facility for Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility, Pearl Harbor Naval Complex, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii" was executed. In accordance with Stipulation VII, Navy Region Hawaii is requesting an amendment regarding the creation and location of a Marine Railway Park in accordance with Stipulation III.G.
  10. Arizona

    In 2008, the Programmatic Agreement Among the US Army Intelligence Center and Fort Huachuca, the Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the Privatization of Family Housing at Fort Huachuca, Arizona was executed. The Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer, in accordance with Stipulation VIII, has requested that the agreement be amended to develop mutually agreeable terms that will assist the installation in fulfilling its good faith consultation responsibilities for this program.