Programmatic Agreement (PA) among the Rocky Mountain Region (Region 8) of the US General Services Administration (GSA); the State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs) of Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Utah; and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) regarding the management of historic properties and their consideration in planning activities (2016). 

Programmatic Agreement By and Among the United States of America, Acting by and Through its General Services Administration, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, and the City and County of San Francisco Regarding the Conveyance, Rehabilitation and Preservation of the Old US Mint Building, San Francisco, California. 

First Amendment to Programmatic Agreement Among the Lexington Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Leestown Division Station 596, the Kentucky State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding Routine Management Activities at the Lexington Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Leestown Division, Fayette County, Kentucky

The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has amended the referenced Program Comment which avoids duplicate reviews under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act regarding telecommunications projects that undergo Section 106 review by the Federal Communications Commission under existing Nationwide Programmatic Agreements. Amendments in 2015 extended the duration of the Program Comment, added agencies that can use the Program Comment, and provided for a monitoring system.

Chairman's Message America's past is alive and is all around us. It affects our present lives, and it influences the course of the future. But honoring and appreciating the past does not mean immersing ourselves in it, much less freezing it as a series of static or interactive museum displays. We live very much in the present and build for the future, but we know that yesterday can enrich modern lives, as it gives us a better sense of where we came from and where we are going.

The ACHP's Leveraging Federal Historic Buildings Working Group has produced its Final Report with findings and recommendations for the public and private sector on how to use historic federal buildings and spark economic growth.

Frequently Asked Questions regarding the Coordination of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Requirements

The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) adopted a plan to support the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Declaration) on March 1, 2013. In the plan, the ACHP commits to raising awareness about the Declaration in the historic preservation community and incorporating the principles and aspirations of the Declaration into ACHP initiatives and programs. As part of the effort to raise awareness, the ACHP also committed to developing guidance on the intersection of the Section 106 process and the Declaration.

Section 213 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) [54 USC §304110] directs the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary), if requested by the Chairman of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) to provide a report to assist the ACHP in discharging its responsibilities under the Act. Specifically, Section 213 states:

- MOA for Charlestown Navy Yard Development Area (1978)    - Amendment #1 (1991)    - Amendment #2 (2010)