1. Public Resources
    The ACHP offers the following questions as a guide for consideration of an agency’s program alternative goals and needs.
  2. Whitepaper
    The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) seeks to help federal agencies understand why they must consult with those Indian tribes who were removed from their homelands by the federal government and now may reside great distances from a proposed undertaking. Understanding the effects of removal on Indian tribes and their ability to participate in the Section 106 process will help federal agencies to carry out their consultation responsibilities more effectively and efficiently.  
  3. Alternate Procedure
    On March 25, 2004, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation approved technical and administrative amendments to the Army Alternate Procedures. Those Army Alternate Procedures set forth a process that Army installations can follow in order to meet their historic preservation review responsibilities under the National Historic Preservation Act. The main purposes of the amendments are to conform the Alternate Procedures to the Army’s internal reorganization, and clarify its exemption regarding designated surface danger zones. 
  4. Guidance Document
    In 2013, the ACHP issued a report, Measuring Economic Impacts of Historic Preservation. Commissioned by the ACHP, with funding assistance from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, the report identifies and analyzes methods for measuring the economic impacts of historic preservation.
  5. Guidance Document
    As communication and decision making happens increasingly online, it is more important than ever to encourage the use of electronic signatures for Section 106 Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs) and project Programmatic Agreements (PAs). Since the Section 106 regulations do not provide detail on what signature formats may be used to execute agreement documents, the ACHP is providing information to support the development of best practices to help those considering whether or how to use electronic signatures for Section 106 agreements.
  6. Memorandum of Agreement
    Memorandum of Agreement Between the United States General Services Administration and the West Virginia State Historic Preservation Office Submitted to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Pursuant to 36 CFR 800 Regarding the Federal Bureau of Investigations's Central Records Complex in Frederick County, Virginia
  7. Memorandum of Agreement
    Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the US General Services Administration (GSA), the Louisiana State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the lease of space at the US Custom House, New Orleans, to the Audubon Institute for the construction of the "Insectarium," or Living Science Museum Project (1999).  
  8. Memorandum of Agreement
    Memorandum of Agreement among the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Oscar G. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Michigan State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Michigan Strategic Fund regarding the Demolition of Building Number 3 at the Oscar G. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iron Mountain, Dickinson County, Michigan
  9. Memorandum of Agreement
    Memorandum of Agreement between the U.S. General Services Administration, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, and the Preservation Officers of Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas Regarding the Disposal of the Federal Helium System at Cliffside and Associated Pipeline and Built Infrastructure 
  10. Memorandum of Agreement
    Memorandum of Agreement Among the General Services Administration, the Washington State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding the Adaptive Use of Union Station, Tacoma, WA.