In the Section 106 context, the term “sacred sites” is sometimes used as shorthand for historic properties of religious and cultural significance to Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations. As with other kinds of properties, sacred sites must be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places in order to be considered in the Section 106 process.
- Issue
- IssueDennis Arguelles, Los Angeles Program Manager, National Parks Conservation Association; Former Director of Programs for Search To Involve Pilipino Americans
- IssueD. Rae Gould, Ph.D.: Former ACHP Native American Program Specialist
- IssueMolly Kerr, Founding Director History Revealed, Inc.
- IssueNathaniel C. Guest, Esq., Executive Director and Founder, Colebrookdale Railroad Preservation Trust Boyertown, PA
- IssueIn recognition that large scale historic properties of significance to Indian Tribes and NHOs may be impacted by undertakings under Section 106, the ACHP launched a Native American traditional cultural landscapes initiative and adopted an action plan in November 2011.
- IssueCassie Chinn, Deputy Executive Director, Wing Luke Museum of the Asian Pacific American Experience, Seattle, WA
- IssuePaul LaRue, history educator, Washington Court House, Ohio
- IssueCheryle Caputo, Cemetery Preservationist/Gravestone Conservator From left, FOBH co-founders June Gillette, Cheryle Caputo, and members Rhonda Atchison, Don Dewey, Kathy Harrington, Cynthia Snow and Donna Shea
- IssueEmily Hotaling Eig, Founder and CEO of EHT Traceries, Inc. Architectural Historian and Historic Preservation Specialist, Washington, D.C.