1. Programmatic Agreement
    First Amended Programmatic Agreement (PA) by and Among the US General Services Administration (GSA), the Utah State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) Regarding the Expansion of US Court Facilities in Salt Lake City, Utah 
  2. Programmatic Agreement
    Programmatic Agreement Among the United States General Service Administration, the National Parks Service, the National Capital Planning Commission, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the District of Columbia Historic Preservation Officer, the Maryland State Historic Preservation Officer, the Virginia State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding the FBI Headquarters Consolidation, Exchange and Redevelopment.
  3. Programmatic Agreement
    Programmatic Agreement Among the National Park Service, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers Regarding Cultural Resources Grants and Financial Assistance
  4. Program Comments
    The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has issued a program comment for the U.S.
  5. Publication
    A Report to the President on the status of federal historic property management
  6. Publication
    [Executive Order 13514, which was the catalyst for publication of this report, has since been revoked.]
  7. Publication
    About the ACHP fact sheet in Spanish
  8. Public Resources
    The ACHP offers the following questions as a guide for consideration of an agency’s program alternative goals and needs.
  9. Whitepaper
    The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) seeks to help federal agencies understand why they must consult with those Indian tribes who were removed from their homelands by the federal government and now may reside great distances from a proposed undertaking. Understanding the effects of removal on Indian tribes and their ability to participate in the Section 106 process will help federal agencies to carry out their consultation responsibilities more effectively and efficiently.  
  10. Alternate Procedure
    On March 25, 2004, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation approved technical and administrative amendments to the Army Alternate Procedures. Those Army Alternate Procedures set forth a process that Army installations can follow in order to meet their historic preservation review responsibilities under the National Historic Preservation Act. The main purposes of the amendments are to conform the Alternate Procedures to the Army’s internal reorganization, and clarify its exemption regarding designated surface danger zones.