Programmatic Agreement Between the US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service State Office, and the State Historic Preservation Officer, Regarding Conservation Assistance in Kansas Amendment #1 to the NRCS Statewide PA for Conservation Assistance in Kansas

Programmatic Agreement Between the US Department of Agriculture, Missouri Natural Resources Conservation Service State Office, Missouri State Historic Preservation Officer, Regarding Conservation Assistance Amendment #1 to the NRCS Statewide PA for Conservation Assistance in Missouri

Programmatic Agreement Between the US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Utah State Office, and the Utah State Historic Preservation Officer, Regarding Conservation Assistance

Two-Year Extension to the Programmatic Agreement Among the Bureau of Land Management, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers Regarding the Manner in Which the BLM Will Meet Its Responsibilities Under the National Historic Preservation Act

Programmatic Agreement Among the U.S. General Services Administration, the U.S. Department of State, the Virginia State Historic Preservation Office, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding Implementation of the Revised Master Plan for the Consolidation of the Foreign Service Institute at the George P. Shultz Foreign Affairs Training Center, Arlington, VA 

This program comment exempts undertakings that may affect historic rail properties within rail rights-of-way from Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The program comment adopts a two-pronged approach: an activities-based approach and a property-based approach.

A Report to the President on the status of federal historic property management

[Executive Order 13514, which was the catalyst for publication of this report, has since been revoked.]

About the ACHP fact sheet in Spanish

States and Indian tribes were the recipients of funding to assist in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic under the CARES Act and American Rescue Plan Act (ARP Act). In responding to questions from states and tribes about the potential applicability of Section 106 to CARES Act and ARP Act funded projects, the ACHP noted that Congress mandated that these funds be given directly to states and tribes, and some federal agencies (such as the Department of the Treasury) acted strictly as a pass-through for the funds to states or tribes.