Programmatic Agreement Among the Federal Highway Administration; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah District; Georgia State Historic Preservation Officer; the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation; Participating Tribes; and the Georgia Department of Transportation Regarding the Section 106 Process for the Transportation Program in Georgia.

Programmatic Agreement Between the US Department of Agriculture, Idaho Natural Resources Conservation Service State Office and the Idaho State Historic Preservation Officer, Regarding Conservation Assistance

Programmatic Agreement Between the US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Michigan State Office and the Michigan State Historic Preservation Officer Regarding Conservation Assistance October 2018, Amended May 2020 Amendment #1 to the NRCS Statewide PA for Conservation Assistance in Michigan

Programmatic Agreement Between the US Department of Agriculture, South Dakota Natural Resources Conservation Service State Office and South Dakota State Historic Preservation Officer, Regarding Conservation Assistance

First Amended Programmatic Agreement (PA) by and Among the US General Services Administration (GSA), the Utah State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) Regarding the Expansion of US Court Facilities in Salt Lake City, Utah 

Programmatic Agreement Among the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. General Services Administration, the District of Columbia State Historic Preservation Officer, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the National Capital Planning Commission, and the National Parks Service Regarding the Perimeter Security Improvement Project at the Harry S. Truman Building, Washington, D.C. 

This program comment provides the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with an alternative way to comply with its responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. 306108, and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR part 800 (Section 106), with regard to the effects of wayside poles and associated infrastructure installed by the nation's freight and passenger railroads to deploy Positive Train Control (PTC) systems on historic properties.

Executive Summary In conjunction with its regular quarterly meeting, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) hosted a summit meeting of Federal agencies November 14, 2002, to discuss cultural heritage tourism. Many Federal agencies are already supporting heritage tourism in various ways through their missions and programs. This meeting provided an opportunity for comparing notes on these activities, and to begin discussing ways to improve the coordination and consistency of such efforts.

This ACHP report from 1979 contains formulas and models for assessing the potential value of historic preservation in terms of energy conservation. Three case studies examine disparate property types - an early federal housing project, a commercial complex, and a adaptively used carriage house - and the report provides readers with tools for undertaking such analysis. The report documents how rehabilitation of historic buildings can produce significant energy conservation benefits over the life of the buildings.

The ACHP's Action Plan to Support SHPOs/THPOs, adopted July 14, 2015. Click here to view the plan in pdf format.