general nav links About ACHP
Federal, State, & Tribal Programs
Training & Education
| skip specific nav links
Home Historic Preservation Programs & Officers Federal FHWA
Colorado Statewide Section 106 Programmatic Agreement
Description of Program
On May 6, 2010, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) executed a Programmatic Agreement (PA) with the Colorado Division, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), and the Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The agreement streamlines Section 106 review on routine projects in Colorado by delegating Section 106 responsibilities to CDOT for the first three steps of the four-step Section 106 review process. It allows CDOT to initiate consultation with the SHPO and other consulting parties, to complete the identification and evaluation of historic properties, and to make findings of effect as required in the regulations at 36 CFR 800.3 -800.5. The agreement also exempts from SHPO review a number of listed activities with minimal potential to affect historic properties.
The PA applies to all FHWA undertakings in Colorado, including transportation enhancements, and projects involving either FHWA funding or approval. The PA specifically provides for:
Analysis of Consultation and Agreement
FHWA initiated consultation with the ACHP in July 2009 with a draft PA developed by the CDOT in consultation with the Colorado Division FHWA and the Colorado SHPO. In the development of this agreement, FHWA solicited the views of Colorado Preservation Inc. (CPI), the Colorado Council of Professional Archaeologists, the Colorado Municipal League, Colorado Counties Incorporated, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and 42 federally recognized Indian tribes with traditional ties to Colorado. It received comments from the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and CDOT worked with Trust staff to incorporate those comments into the PA. The PA replaces a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding minor transportation projects executed by FHWA, CDOT, the ACHP, and SHPO on February 15, 1991; and a PA for the Management and Preservation of Colorado Historic Bridges, executed among the parties on July 16, 2003.
Why this is a Good Agreement
The PA does little to alter the review process in Part B of the ACHP’s regulations; however, it clarifies the roles of CDOT and FHWA in Steps 1-4 of the review process, detailing the areas in which CDOT is delegated responsibility for review. The agreement establishes parameters for involving consulting parties, Indian tribes, and other members of the public, including procedures for notification and participation of consulting parties and Indian tribes that go beyond what is required in the regulations. Colorado FHWA and CDOT have good working relationships with Indian tribes and the SHPO, and projects have resulted in few disputes among local communities and parties to consultation. Lessons learned in a couple of large projects (e.g., the Interstate 70 Mountain Corridor and Interstate 25 through the city of Pueblo) laid the groundwork for a model program emphasizing integrated planning, context sensitive design, and early involvement of consulting parties and affected communities. The streamlining measures in the PA should help Colorado continue to excel in these efforts.
For more information please contact email@example.com.
Posted May 26, 2010