skip
general nav links
About ACHP

ACHP News

National Historic
Preservation
Program

Working with
Section 106

Federal, State, & Tribal Programs

Training & Education

Publications

Search |
 |
skip
specific nav links
Home Working
with Section 106 Section
106 in Action Archive
of Prominent Section 106 Cases Michigan: Demolition of Allen
Park VA Medical Center
Michigan:
Demolition of Allen Park
Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Agency: Department of Veterans
Affairs
Criteria for ACHP Involvement:
-
The proposed action will result in the demolition
of a National Register-eligible historic district in its entirety
(Criterion 1).
-
The project raises questions regarding the
timeliness of Section 106 review and the Department of Veterans Affairs'
interpretation of its responsibilities under Section 106 (Criterion
2).
Recent Developments
On May 24, 2001, ACHP staff participated in an onsite consultation
meeting regarding demolition of the Allen Park Veterans Affairs Medical
Center (VAMC). In attendance were representatives of the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA), the Michigan State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO), the City of Allen Park, the National Trust for Historic Preservation,
four State and local preservation organizations, and the Ford Motor Land
Development Corporation (Ford). The meeting provided the first forum for
the preservation community to express their concerns to VA and Ford.

Allen Park Veterans Affairs Medical Center, MI
(photo courtesy of Dept. of Veterans Affairs)
At the meeting, Ford indicated that it did not have clear plans for the
site, but it was initiating planning efforts. Given this, but recognizing
the congressional mandate for VA to assist Ford in demolishing the complex,
the consulting parties questioned whether Ford might delay total demolition
while exploring possible options for preservation during its planning
efforts. In addition, the Michigan SHPO, the National Trust, the Michigan
Preservation Network, and Preservation Wayne presented VA and Ford with
a formal resolution characterizing the proposed mitigation for demolition
as grossly inadequate.
The resolution proposes instead creating a $2 million historic preservation
fund, patterned on several similar funds that have been established. ACHP anticipates further consultation with VA on these issues in the
near future.
Background
The Allen Park VAMC was constructed between 1937 and 1939 on land in
Allen Park, near Detroit, which was donated to the Federal Government
by Henry and Clara Ford. The complex is one of 50 VAMCs developed between
1920 and 1946, which have been determined eligible for the National Register
of Historic Places as part of a thematic group. Georgian Revival in design,
the eight-building complex is dominated by the main hospital building,
the original central portion of which is surrounded by large additions
from 1949 and 1961.
In 1986, the VA decided to construct a new VAMC in downtown Detroit.
It is unclear to what extent this constructions foreseeable impact
on historic properties at Allen Park VAMC received adequate environmental
review at that time. It appears that consideration of any such effects
was essentially postponed for later review under Section 106
and was not addressed substantively during compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act.
In 1986, the long range plan for the Allen Park VAMC site was reuse
for a new long term care facility with a primary care component. However,
by the time that the new Detroit VAMC opened 10 years later, funding had
never been allocated for new construction at Allen Park, and VAs
focus had shifted from inpatient to outpatient care. A scaled back nursing
home function was accommodated in the new downtown facility, leaving only
a limited primary care facility at Allen Park, which utilized only about
one-tenth of the complexs square footage.
The original deed to the Federal Government stipulated that the land
would revert to Ford if it ceased to be used for care of veterans. Given
the underutilization of the property by VA, State and local representatives
entered into discussions with VA and Congressman John D. Dingell regarding
the potential or the land to revert to Ford, which would return it to
the tax rolls. By the spring of 2000, VAs preferred alternative
was to demolish all buildings on the site and transfer the property to
Ford. (The reversion clause does not require specifically that the site
be cleared before transfer, but Ford and VA have agreed to that interpretation
of its intent.)
VA did not initiate Section 106 consultation with the Michigan SHPO during
the discussions regarding the fate of the complex, and it is not clear
that the historic significance of the property was fully considered in
decisionmaking. Intervening Congressional action then precluded the option
of discussing alternatives to demolition during Section 106 review. The
Veterans Benefits and Health Care Improvement Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-419)
included a provision requiring VA to enter into a contract with Ford to
demolish the Allen Park complex and remediate the sites hazardous
materials. The legislation authorizes VA to pay Ford up to $14 million
to cover costs. President Clinton signed the legislation into law on November
1, 2000.
In January, 2001, VA initiated consultation pursuant to Section 106.
Proposed mitigation for demolition of the complex included archiving of
historic records; consultation with the Michigan SHPO on a commemorative
flagpole and memorial called for in the legislation; and allowing the
Allen Park Historical Society to salvage architectural elements. ACHP
elected to join the consultation following a request from the Michigan
SHPO.
Policy Highlights
VA controls a significant number of historic resources and must seek
to balance their stewardship against changing residential and health care
needs of veterans. Unfortunately, the agency has a limited number of professional
cultural resource staff to meet this need. Too frequently, as illustrated
in this case, historic preservation is not integrated into decisionmaking.
Reversing this trend is important, since aging of the infrastructure and
shifts in patient care policies and expectations will doubtless result
in a growing number of cases sharing the fundamental issues seen at Allen
Park.
Staff contact: Druscilla Null
Updated
June 6, 2002
Return to Top |