general nav links
Federal, State, & Tribal Programs
Training & Education
specific nav links |
Home Working with Section 106 ACHP Case Digest Spring 2005 Washington: Construction of the Port Angeles Graving Dock
Washington: Construction of the Port Angeles Graving Dock
Agency: Federal Highway Administration
In March 2005, the ACHP participated in Section 106 consultation to resolve outstanding issues regarding the Port Angeles Graving Dock. The agency met several times with FHWA, the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the Port of Port Angeles, and city and county officials, and toured the graving dock site.
That same month, the ACHP met off-site with the proposed projects consulting parties. A facilitator also was present to help the tribe and the Washington Department of Transportation (WADOT) agree on the disposition of the 300-plus ancestral burials from the site, as well as the disposition of the abandoned graving dock site.
Local government officials are concerned about the loss of jobs from the abandoned graving dock project. They say that they want to keep the graving dock/Tse-whit-zen village site and other waterfront properties open to industrial development that is crucial to the economic well-being of their city.
The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe says that it wishes to see all of the 300 burials and more than 1,000 human bone fragments reburied at the site following traditional Klallam custom, close to the place they were recovered. The tribe also has requested that no new development occur over undisturbed portions of the village site. It says that it would ultimately like to take over ownership of the graving dock site to ensure the protection of the archeological remains and burials. In the meantime, the human remains lie in a secured location in custom-made cedar coffins.
During consultation in March, the ACHP advised the parties of the role of Section 106. FHWA is taking steps to conclude the Section 106 review process with the facilitated resolution.
Such a resolution is complicated
by the multiple jurisdictions involved in the proposed project. WADOT is the current
property owner, although the Port of Port Angeles and the City of Port Angeles
have jurisdiction over the property. FHWA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
have legal responsibility for compliance with Section 106, but limited authority
to dictate an outcome because they do not own the
The ACHP will remain involved in consultation, which is expected to result in an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Agreement for the disposition of human remains and archeological materials at the Port Angeles Graving Dock construction site.
For background information on this case, see the winter 2005 Case Digest.
Staff contact: Carol Legard
Return to Top