skip
general nav links
About
ACHP 
ACHP News
 National
Historic Preservation Program  Working with Section 106 
Federal, State, & Tribal Programs

Training & Education  Publications  Search |  |
skip
specific nav links Home
Working with Section 106 ACHP
Case Digest Spring
2005 Oklahoma: Clean Up of Tar
Creek Mining Pollution, Ottawa County Update/Closed
Case: Oklahoma:
Clean Up of Tar Creek Mining Pollution, Ottawa County Agencies:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau of Indian Affairs
As
reported in the winter 2005 Case Digest,
Ottawa County, Oklahoma, had been the worlds largest producer of zinc and
lead ore, but it now considered the most polluted area in the United States. Much
of it is on Quapaw tribal land and contains historic structures and abandoned
mines, and possible archeological resources. The
ACHP participated in creating an agreement to coordinate and streamline Section
106 compliance among numerous agencies that have various Tar Creek clean-up projects. |
|
 Tar
Creek, Ottawa County, OK (photo: USGS) | During
a January 2005 interagency meeting hosted by the Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma, the
agencies developed a Programmatic Agreement that outlines mitigation measures
for the sites historic properties. Since then, the ACHP and other
consulting parties to the Tar Creek clean-up project concluded consultation and
executed the agreement. Signatories include the ACHP, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Tulsa District), U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, Oklahoma
State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and the Oklahoma Archeological Survey
(OAS). A major purpose of the agreement is to establish a coordinated,
interagency approach for the agencies to use to address historic preservation
in their clean-up projects. To streamline implementation of the agreement, the
Corps is the designated facilitator, assisted by an interagency/tribal cultural
resources technical team. The agreement enables the agencies to proceed with certain
types of clean-up activities in the most severely polluted area, without further
consultation. One key component of the agreement is the agencies
preparation of the Tar Creek Heritage Study. This study will document the history
of the area, with particular emphasis on 1) its lead and zinc mining legacy; 2)
historic associations with Indian tribes; 3) property types and integrity criteria
for National Register evaluation; 4) historic properties worthy of possible preservation;
and 5) field recordation. The study also will examine the history of a parcel
known as the Catholic 40, which was 40 acres owned by a Catholic mission and that
was the site of a historic school of interest to the Quapaw Tribe. The study will
include a list of persons knowledgeable about the history of the area who might
be candidates for oral history interviews, as well as a bibliography of audio-visual
resources and other resources pertaining to the history of the project area. The
Corps will use the study to determine the National-Register eligibility of the
project area, in consultation with the SHPO, OAS, Quapaw Tribe, and other Indian
tribes. Other notable provisions of the agreement address the archeological
potential of the project area, remediation of the Catholic 40 parcel, how historic
preservation will be considered in the post-remediation reclamation of the project
area, inadvertent discoveries, emergencies, and mechanisms for interagency coordination
in the agreements implementation. The agreement will promote both
efficiency and consistency in identification, evaluation, and treatment of historic
properties in both the conduct of cleanup activities and post-cleanup land reclamation
activities. It provides for a single historic preservation program that would
be shared among the involved agencies, for improved historic preservation and
to save resources for needed cleanup goals. For background information
on this case, see the winter 2005 Case
Digest. Staff contact: Marge
Nowick Posted June 9, 2005
Return to Top |