Return to Case Digest Archives
skip general nav links ACHP home About ACHP

ACHP News

National Historic
Preservation
Program


Working with
Section 106


Federal, State, & Tribal Programs

Training & Education

Publications

Search
 skip specific nav links
Home arrow Working with Section 106 arrow ACHP Case Digest arrow Spring 2005
Case Digest, Spring 2005
Protecting Historic Properties: Section 106 in Action

Introduction and Criteria for ACHP Involvement

Colorado:
Update/Closed Case: Transfer of Ownership of Redstone Castle, Redstone

District of Columbia:
Reuse of the West Campus of St. Elizabeth's Hospital

Florida:
Update/Closed Case: Demolition of Properties in the Pensacola Naval Air Station Historic District

Massachusetts:
Construction of a Wind Farm, Nantucket Sound

Oklahoma:
Update/Closed Case: Clean Up of Tar Creek Mining Pollution, Ottawa County

Virginia:
Modification of Broad Run Bridge, Prince William County

Washington:
Update: Construction of the Port Angeles Graving Dock

Nationwide:
Update/Closed Case: Development of an Exemption to Section 106 for the Interstate Highway System

Nationwide:
Management of Off-Highway Vehicles in National Forests


Introduction

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires Federal agencies to consider historic preservation values when planning their activities. In the Section 106 process, a Federal agency must identify affected historic properties, evaluate the proposed action’s effects, and then explore ways to avoid or mitigate those effects.

The Federal agency often conducts this process with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), State Historic Preservation Officers, representatives of Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, and other parties with an interest in the issues.

Sometimes a Programmatic Agreement (PA) or a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is reached and signed by the project’s consulting parties. A PA clarifies roles, responsibilities, and expectations of all parties engaged in large and complex Federal projects that may have an effect on a historic property. An MOA specifies the mitigation measure that the lead Federal agency must take to ensure the protection of a property's historic values.

Each year thousands of Federal actions undergo Section 106 review. The vast majority of cases are routine and resolved at the State or tribal level, without the ACHP's involvement.

A considerable number of cases, however, present issues or challenges that warrant the ACHP’s attention. The criteria for ACHP involvement in reviewing Section 106 cases are set forth in Appendix A of the ACHP’s regulations. In accordance with those criteria, the ACHP is likely to enter the Section 106 process when an undertaking:

  • has substantial impacts on important historic properties;
  • presents important questions of policy or interpretation;
  • has the potential for presenting procedural problems; and/or
  • presents issues of concern to Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations.

This report presents a representative cross-section of undertakings that illustrate the variety and complexity of Federal activities in which the ACHP is currently involved.

It illustrates the ways the Federal Government influences what happens to historic properties in communities throughout the Nation, and highlights the importance of informed citizens to be alert to potential conflicts between Federal actions and historic preservation goals, and the necessity of public participation to achieve the best possible preservation solution.

In addition to this report, ACHP’s Web site contains a useful library of information about the ACHP, Section 106 review, and the national historic preservation program.

 

Posted May 5, 2005

Return to Top