general nav links About
Federal, State, & Tribal Programs
Training & Education
specific nav links
Home Working with Section 106 ACHP Case Digest Spring 2003
Case Digest, Spring 2003
Protecting Historic Properties: Section 106 in Action
Introduction and Criteria for ACHP Involvement
District of Columbia:
South Dakota, & Wyoming:
Mexico & Arizona:
Dakota, North Dakota, Montana, & Nebraska:
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires Federal agencies to consider historic preservation values when planning their activities. In the Section 106 process, a Federal agency must identify affected historic properties, evaluate the proposed actions effects, and then explore ways to avoid or mitigate those effects.
The Federal agency conducts this process in consultation with State Historic Preservation Officers, representatives of Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), and other parties with an interest in the issues. Sometimes a Programmatic Agreement (PA) is reached and signed by the projects consulting parties. A PA is an option provided for in the ACHPs regulations that sets forth a tailored process to guide how an agency meets the requirements of Section 106.
Each year thousands of Federal actions undergo Section 106 review. The vast majority of cases are routine and resolved at the State or tribal level, without involvement of ACHP. However, a considerable number of cases present issues or challenges that warrant ACHPs attention. The specific Criteria for Council Involvement in reviewing Section 106 cases are set forth in Appendix A of ACHPs regulations. In accordance with those criteria, ACHP is likely to enter the Section 106 process when an undertaking:
This report provides information on a small but representative cross-section of undertakings that illustrate the variety and complexity of Federal activities in which ACHP is currently involved. It illustrates the ways the Federal Government influences what happens to historic properties in communities throughout the Nation, and highlights the importance of informed citizens to be alert to potential conflicts between Federal actions and historic preservation goals, and the necessity for public participation to achieve the best possible preservation solution.
In addition to this report, ACHPs Web site contains a useful library of information about ACHP and Section 106 review.
Return to Top