Return to Case Digest Archives
skip general nav links ACHP home About ACHP


National Historic

Working with
Section 106

Federal, State, & Tribal Programs

Training & Education


 skip specific nav links
Home arrow Working with Section 106 arrow ACHP Case Digest arrow Fall 2002 arrow New York: Transfer of Ownership of the Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant
New York: Transfer of Ownership of the Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant

Agency: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
As reported in the Spring 2002 Case Digest, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission accepted the surrendered license for a private historic hydroelectric plant before an agreement could be reached on the treatment of the National Register-listed property.

FERC’s actions before concluding the Section 106 review process has created significant procedural problems that must be addressed before the plant can be transferred to New York State.

In accordance with FERC’s regulations, in April 2002 ACHP requested a rehearing of the case because it did not have evidence that FERC executed an agreement as required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. At that time ACHP also requested that FERC consider specific issues regarding mitigation and the involvement of consulting parties and the public, and advise ACHP about how FERC planned to proceed.

Historic gears inside the Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant, New York



Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant, New York (photo courtesy of Fourth Branch Associates and NY State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation)


In August 2002, FERC denied ACHP’s request for a rehearing, asserting that FERC substantially complied with Section 106 review because it had required the plant owner to document the historic property and to use reversible techniques to decommission the plant.

FERC also stated that it terminated consultation through its November 2001 notice requesting review and comments on a Draft Environmental Assessment of the project, even though the notice did not explicitly state that consultation was being terminated. FERC’s failure to follow the procedures that are set forth in ACHP’s regulations could result in a challenge by parties with an interest in the project.

ACHP is currently evaluating the situation and possible steps to be taken with FERC. For background information on this case, see the Spring 2002 Case Digest at

Staff contact: Laura Henley Dean

Posted November 7, 2002

Return to Top