skip
general nav links
About ACHP

ACHP News

National Historic
Preservation
Program

Working with
Section 106

Federal, State, & Tribal Programs

Training & Education

Publications

Search |
 |
skip
specific nav links
Home Working
with Section 106 ACHP
Case Digest Fall 2002 District of Columbia: Security
Upgrades at the Washington Monument
District
of Columbia: Security Upgrades at the Washington Monument
Agency: National Park Service
|
Standing tall
as a prominent symbol in the Nations capital, the Washington
Monument has received visitors from all over the world since 1888.
The 555-foot obelisk and its grounds are slated to receive permanent
security measures to replace the existing temporary barriers.
The plan has required an expedited but intensive consultation process
to enable the interested public to participate in examining the
potential effects of the proposed modifications on this important
National Register property.
|
The National Park Service (NPS) is proposing permanent security measures
for the Washington Monument and its grounds, which NPS administers. The
security upgrade would be combined with visitor enhancements that include
an underground visitor facility and tunnel leading to the monument through
its foundation; the historic 1888 Monument Lodges use as a visitors
entrance to the monument; and a new system of walkways and low walls to
minimize
recognizable security barriers on the grounds.

ACHP members and staff tour the Washington Monument
grounds, March 2002, Washington, DC (staff photo)
In May 2002, ACHP signed an agreement with NPS, the National Capital
Planning Commission, and the District of Columbia State Historic Preservation
Officer (SHPO) that outlines a streamlined review process for the monuments
permanent security improvements.
Consulting parties in the Section 106 process included a number of organizations
such as the Committee of 100 on the Federal City, the National Coalition
to Save Our Mall, Advisory Neighborhood Commission 2A, and the National
Trust for Historic Preservation.
As plans have developed, Section 106 consultation meetings have provided
a forum for consideration of concerns that have been raised by a number
of the participants.
Some consider the Monument Lodge too small to serve as an entrance to
both the monument and the proposed underground facility, and they are
concerned that the new construction might be incompatible with the character
of the monument and the lodge. In addition, they point out that a tunnel
must be excavated with care to ensure that the ground upon which the 90,854-ton
monument sits is not destabilized.
The plan as currently proposed would change the visitors experience
as well, and differing views have been expressed as to whether such change
would be positive. Visitors would enter the monument through a tunnel
under the monuments lobby, and would exit through the lobby. For
visitors viewing the monument from the grounds, the experience would be
altered by a skylight and walkways with low retaining walls intersecting
the grounds.
As consultation continues on the plan, ACHP will be reviewing studies
NPS develops to identify appropriate parameters for modifications to the
monument and grounds.
Staff contact: Martha
Catlin
Posted
November 6, 2002
Return to Top |