The Keeper's regulations required persons wishing to have properties removed from the Register to submit information to the Keeper through the State Historic Preservation Officer or Federal representative. Because plaintiffs had not done this, the court found that plaintiffs had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. 520 F. Supp. at 13-14. The court rejected plaintiffs' claim that relief should be granted because the Keeper's regulations did not set forth the administrative mechanism to be followed if errors were found in the nomination process. Id. at 14. The court also rejected plaintiffs' claims that administrative review would be futile. Id. at 15.
|Go to Table of Contents||Go to Top|