|
About ACHP |
skip
specific nav links Guidance Home 36
CFR PART 800 -- PROTECTION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES (incorporating amendments
effective August 5, 2004)
Sec.
800.1 Purposes.
800.2 Participants in the Section 106 process.
Subpart B -- The Section 106 Process
800.3 Initiation
of the section 106 process.
800.4 Identification
of historic properties.
800.5 Assessment of adverse effects.
800.6 Resolution of adverse effects.
800.7 Failure to
resolve adverse effects.
800.8 Coordination
with the National Environmental Policy act.
800.9 Council
review of Section 106 compliance.
800.10 Special
requirements for protecting National Historic Landmarks.
800.11 Documentation standards.
800.12 Emergency situations.
800.13 Post-review discoveries.
Subpart C -- Program Alternatives
800.14 Federal
agency program alternatives.
800.15 Tribal,
State and Local Program Alternatives. (Reserved)
800.16 Definitions.
Appendix A – Criteria
for Council
involvement in reviewing individual
section 106 cases
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 470s.
Subpart
A-Purposes and
Participants
§
800.1 Purposes.
(a) Purposes of the section 106 process. Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of
their undertakings on historic properties and afford the Council a reasonable
opportunity to comment on such undertakings. The procedures in this part define how Federal agencies meet these
statutory responsibilities. The section
106 process seeks to accommodate historic preservation concerns with the needs
of Federal undertakings through consultation among the agency official and
other parties with an interest in the
effects of the undertaking on historic properties, commencing at the early
stages of project planning. The goal of
consultation is to identify historic properties potentially affected by the
undertaking, assess its effects and seek ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate
any adverse effects on historic properties.
(b) Relation to other
provisions of the act. Section 106 is related to other
provisions of the act designed to further the national policy of historic
preservation. References to those
provisions are included in this part to identify circumstances where they may
affect actions taken to meet section 106 requirements. Such provisions may have their own
implementing regulations or guidelines and are not intended to be implemented
by the procedures in this part except insofar as they relate to the section 106
process. Guidelines, policies and
procedures issued by other agencies, including the Secretary, have been cited
in this part for ease of access and are not incorporated by reference.
(c) Timing. The agency official must complete the section 106 process “prior
to the approval of the expenditure of any Federal funds on the undertaking or
prior to the issuance of any license.” This does not prohibit agency official from conducting or authorizing
nondestructive project planning activities before completing compliance with
section 106, provided that such actions do not restrict the subsequent
consideration of alternatives to avoid, minimize or mitigate the undertaking's
adverse effects on historic properties. The agency official shall ensure that the section 106 process is
initiated early in the undertaking's planning, so that a broad range of
alternatives may be considered during the planning process for the undertaking.
§
800.2 Participants in the Section 106
process.
(a) Agency official. It is the
statutory obligation of the Federal agency to fulfill the requirements of
section 106 and to ensure that an agency official with jurisdiction over an
undertaking takes legal and financial responsibility for section 106 compliance
in accordance with subpart B of this part. The agency official has approval authority for the undertaking and can
commit the Federal agency to take appropriate action for a specific undertaking
as a result of section 106 compliance. For the purposes of subpart C of this part, the agency official has the
authority to commit the Federal agency to any obligation it may assume in the
implementation of a program alternative. The agency official may be a State, local, or tribal government official
who has been delegated legal responsibility for compliance with section 106 in
accordance with Federal law.
(1) Professional standards. Section 112(a)(1)(A) of the act requires each Federal agency responsible
for the protection of historic resources, including archeological resources, to
ensure that all actions taken by employees or contractors of the agency shall
meet professional standards under regulations developed by the Secretary.
(2) Lead Federal agency. If
more than one Federal agency is involved in an undertaking, some or all the
agencies may designate a lead Federal agency, which shall identify the appropriate
official to serve as the agency official who shall act on their behalf,
fulfilling their collective responsibilities under section 106. Those Federal agencies that do not designate
a lead Federal agency remain individually responsible for their compliance with
this part.
(3) Use of contractors. Consistent with applicable conflict of interest laws, the agency
official may use the services of applicants, consultants, or designees to
prepare information, analyses and recommendations under this part. The agency official remains legally
responsible for all required findings and determinations. If a document or study is prepared by a
non-Federal party, the agency official is responsible for ensuring that its
content meets applicable standards and guidelines.
(4) Consultation. The agency
official shall involve the consulting parties described in paragraph (c) of
this section in findings and determinations made during the section 106
process. The agency official should
plan consultations appropriate to the scale of the undertaking and the scope of
Federal involvement and coordinated with other requirements of other statutes,
as applicable, such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the Native
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, the American Indian Religious
Freedom Act, the Archeological Resources Protection Act and agency-specific
legislation. The Council encourages the
agency official to use to the extent possible existing agency procedures and
mechanisms to fulfill the consultation requirements of this part.
(b) Council. The Council issues
regulations to implement section 106, provides guidance and advice on the
application of the procedures in this part, and generally oversees the
operation of the section 106 process. The Council also consults with and comments to agency officials on
individual undertakings and programs that affect historic properties.
(1) Council entry into the section 106 process. When the Council determines that its
involvement is necessary to ensure that the purposes of section 106 and the act
are met, the Council may enter the section 106 process. Criteria guiding Council decisions to enter
the section 106 process are found in appendix A to this part. The Council will document that the criteria
have been met and notify the parties to the section 106 process as required by
this part.
(2) Council assistance. Participants in the section 106 process may seek advice, guidance and
assistance from the Council on the application of this part to specific
undertakings, including the resolution of disagreements, whether or not the
Council is formally involved in the review of the undertaking. If questions arise regarding the conduct of
the section 106 process, participants are encouraged to obtain the Council's
advice on completing the process.
(c) Consulting parties. The
following parties have consultative roles in the section 106 process.
(1) State historic preservation officer.
(i) The State historic
preservation officer (SHPO) reflects the interests of the State and its
citizens in the preservation of their cultural heritage. In accordance with section 101(b)(3) of the
act, the SHPO advises and assists Federal agencies in carrying out their
section 106 responsibilities and cooperates with such agencies, local governments
and organizations and individuals to ensure that historic properties are taking
into consideration at all levels of planning and development.
(ii) If an Indian tribe
has assumed the functions of the SHPO in the section 106 process for
undertakings on tribal lands, the SHPO shall participate as a consulting party
if the undertaking takes place on tribal lands but affects historic properties
off tribal lands, if requested in accordance with § 800.3(c)(1), or if the
Indian tribe agrees to include the SHPO pursuant to § 800.3(f)(3).
(2) Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations.
(i) Consultation on tribal lands.
(A) Tribal historic preservation officer. For a tribe that has assumed the responsibilities of the SHPO for
section 106 on tribal lands under section 101(d)(2) of the act, the tribal
historic preservation officer (THPO) appointed or designated in accordance with
the act is the official representative for the purposes of section 106. The agency official shall consult with the
THPO in lieu of the SHPO regarding undertakings occurring on or affecting
historic properties on tribal lands.
(B) Tribes that have not assumed SHPO functions. When an Indian tribe
has not assumed the responsibilities of the SHPO for section 106 on tribal
lands under section 101(d)(2) of the act, the agency official shall consult
with a representative designated by such Indian tribe in addition to the SHPO
regarding undertakings occurring on or affecting historic properties on its
tribal lands. Such Indian tribes have the
same rights of consultation and concurrence that the THPOs are given throughout
subpart B of this part, except that such consultations shall be in addition to
and on the same basis as consultation with the SHPO.
(ii) Consultation on historic properties of
significance to Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations. Section 101(d)(6)(B) of the act requires the
agency official to consult with any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization that attaches religious and cultural significance to historic
properties that may be affected by an undertaking. This requirement applies regardless of the location of the
historic property. Such Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization shall be a consulting party.
(A) The agency official
shall ensure that consultation in the section 106 process provides the Indian
tribe or Native Hawaiian organization a reasonable opportunity to identify its
concerns about historic properties, advise on the identification and evaluation
of historic properties, including those of traditional religious and cultural
importance, articulate its views on the undertaking's effects on such
properties, and participate in the resolution of adverse effects. It is the responsibility of the agency official
to make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify Indian tribes and Native
Hawaiian organizations that shall be consulted in the section 106 process. Consultation should commence early in the
planning process, in order to identify and discuss relevant preservation issues
and resolve concerns about the confidentiality of information on historic
properties.
(B) The Federal
Government has a unique legal relationship with Indian tribes set forth in the
Constitution of the United States, treaties, statutes, and court
decisions. Consultation with Indian
tribes should be conducted in a sensitive manner respectful of tribal
sovereignty. Nothing in this part alters, amends, repeals, interprets or
modifies tribal sovereignty, any treaty rights, or other rights of an Indian
tribe, or preempts, modifies or limits the exercise of any such rights.
(C) Consultation with an
Indian tribe must recognize the government-to-government relationship between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. The agency official shall consult with representatives designated or
identified by the tribal government or the governing body of a Native Hawaiian
organization. Consultation with Indian
tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations should be conducted in a manner
sensitive to the concerns and needs of the Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization.
(D) When Indian tribes
and Native Hawaiian organizations attach religious and cultural significance to
historic properties off tribal lands, section 101(d)(6)(B) of the act requires
Federal agencies to consult with such Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian
organizations in the section 106 process. Federal agencies should be aware that frequently historic properties of
religious and cultural significance are located on ancestral, aboriginal, or
ceded lands of Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations and should
consider that when complying with the procedures in this part.
(E) An Indian tribe or a
Native Hawaiian organization may enter into an agreement with an agency
official that specifies how they will carry out responsibilities under this
part, including concerns over the confidentiality of information. An agreement may cover all aspects of tribal
participation in the section 106 process, provided that no modification may be
made in the roles of other parties to the section 106 process without their
consent. An agreement may grant the
Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization additional rights to participate
or concur in agency decisions in the section 106 process beyond those specified
in subpart B of this part. The agency
official shall provide a copy of any such agreement to the Council and the
appropriate SHPOs.
(F) An Indian tribe that
has not assumed the responsibilities of the SHPO for section 106 on tribal
lands under section 101(d)(2) of the act may notify the agency official in
writing that it is waiving its rights under § 800.6(c)(1) to execute a
memorandum of agreement.
(3) Representatives of local governments. A representative of a local government with jurisdiction over the
area in which the effects of an undertaking may occur is entitled to
participate as a consulting party. Under other provisions of Federal law, the local government may be
authorized to act as the agency official for purposes of section 106.
(4) Applicants for Federal assistance, permits, licenses and other
approvals. An applicant for Federal
assistance or for a Federal permit, license or other approval is entitled to
participate as a consulting party as defined in this part. The agency official may authorize an
applicant or group of applicants to initiate consultation with the SHPO/THPO
and others, but remains legally responsible for all findings and determinations
charged to the agency official. The
agency official shall notify the SHPO/THPO when an applicant or group of applicants
is so authorized. A Federal agency may
authorize all applicants in a specific program pursuant to this section by
providing notice to all SHPO/THPOs. Federal agencies that provide authorizations to applicants remain
responsible for their government to government relationships with Indian
tribes.
(5) Additional consulting parties. Certain individuals and organizations with a demonstrated interest in
the undertaking may participate as consulting parties due to the nature of
their legal or economic relation to the undertaking or affected properties, or
their concern with the undertaking's effects on historic properties.
(1) Nature of involvement. The views of the public are essential to
informed Federal decisionmaking in the section 106 process. The agency official shall seek and consider
the views of the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of
the undertaking and its effects on historic properties, the likely interest of
the public in the effects on historic properties, confidentiality concerns of
private individuals and businesses, and the relationship of the Federal
involvement to the undertaking.
(2) Providing notice and information. The agency official must, except where appropriate to protect
confidentiality concerns of affected parties, provide the public with
information about an undertaking and its effects on historic properties and
seek public comment and input. Members
of the public may also provide views on their own initiative for the agency
official to consider in decisionmaking.
(3) Use of agency procedures. The agency official may use the agency's procedures for public
involvement under the National Environmental Policy Act or other program
requirements in lieu of public involvement requirements in subpart B of this
part, if they provide adequate opportunities for public involvement consistent
with this subpart.
Subpart
B-The section 106 Process
§
800.3 Initiation of the section 106 process.
(a) Establish undertaking. The
agency official shall determine whether the proposed Federal action is an
undertaking as defined in § 800.16(y) and, if so, whether it is a type of
activity that has the potential to cause effects on historic properties.
(1) No potential to cause effects. If the undertaking is a type of activity that does not have the
potential to cause effects on historic properties, assuming such historic
properties were present, the agency official has no further obligations under
section 106 or this part.
(2) Program alternatives. If
the review of the undertaking is governed by a Federal agency program
alternative established under § 800.14 or a programmatic agreement in existence
before January 11, 2001, the agency official shall follow the program
alternative.
(b) Coordinate with other reviews. The agency official should coordinate the steps of the section 106
process, as appropriate, with the overall planning schedule for the undertaking
and with any reviews required under other authorities such as the National
Environmental Policy Act, the Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act, the American Indian Religious Freedom Act, the Archeological
Resources Protection Act and agency-specific legislation, such as section 4(f)
of the Department of Transportation Act. Where consistent with the procedures in this subpart, the agency
official may use information developed for other reviews under Federal, State
or tribal law to meet the requirements of section 106.
(c) Identify the appropriate SHPO and/or THPO. As part of its initial planning, the agency
official shall determine the appropriate SHPO or SHPOs to be involved in the
section 106 process. The agency
official shall also determine whether the undertaking may occur on or affect
historic properties on any tribal lands and, if so, whether a THPO has assumed
the duties of the SHPO. The agency
official shall then initiate consultation with the appropriate officer or
officers.
(1) Tribal assumption of SHPO responsibilities. Where an Indian tribe has assumed the
section 106 responsibilities of the SHPO on tribal lands pursuant to section
101(d)(2) of the act, consultation for undertakings occurring on tribal land or
for effects on tribal land is with the THPO for the Indian tribe in lieu of the
SHPO. Section 101(d)(2)(D)(iii) of the
act authorizes owners of properties on tribal lands which are neither owned by
a member of the tribe nor held in trust by the Secretary for the benefit of the
tribe to request the SHPO to participate in the section 106 process in addition
to the THPO.
(2) Undertakings involving more than one State. If more than one State is involved in an
undertaking, the involved SHPOs may agree to designate a lead SHPO to act on
their behalf in the section 106 process, including taking actions that would
conclude the section 106 process under this subpart.
(3) Conducting consultation. The agency official should consult with the SHPO/THPO in a manner
appropriate to the agency planning process for the undertaking and to the
nature of the undertaking and its effects on historic properties.
(4) Failure of the SHPO/THPO to respond. If the SHPO/THPO fails to respond within 30 days of receipt of a
request for review of a finding or determination, the agency official may
either proceed to the next step in the process based on the finding or
determination or consult with the Council in lieu of the SHPO/THPO. If the SHPO/THPO re-enters the section 106
process, the agency official shall continue the consultation without being
required to reconsider previous findings or determinations.
(d) Consultation on tribal lands. Where the Indian tribe has not assumed the responsibilities of the SHPO
on tribal lands, consultation with the Indian tribe regarding undertakings
occurring on such tribe's lands or effects on such tribal lands shall be in
addition to and on the same basis as consultation with the SHPO. If the SHPO has withdrawn from the process,
the agency official may complete the section 106 process with the Indian tribe
and the Council, as appropriate. An
Indian tribe may enter into an agreement with a SHPO or SHPOs specifying the
SHPO's participation in the section 106 process for undertakings occurring on
or affecting historic properties on tribal lands.
(e) Plan to involve the public. In consultation with the SHPO/THPO, the agency official shall plan for
involving the public in the section 106 process. The agency official shall identify the appropriate points for
seeking public input and for notifying the public of proposed actions,
consistent with § 800.2(d).
(f) Identify other consulting parties. In consultation with the SHPO/THPO, the agency official shall identify
any other parties entitled to be consulting parties and invite them to
participate as such in the section 106 process. The agency official may invite others to participate as
consulting parties as the section 106 process moves forward.
(1) Involving local governments and applicants. The agency official shall invite any local
governments or applicants that are entitled to be consulting parties under §
800.2(c).
(2) Involving Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations. The agency official shall make a reasonable
and good faith effort to identify any Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian
organizations that might attach religious and cultural significance to historic
properties in the area of potential effects and invite them to be consulting
parties. Such Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization that requests in writing to be a consulting party shall
be one.
(3) Requests to be consulting parties. The agency official shall consider all written requests of individuals
and organizations to participate as consulting parties and, in consultation
with the SHPO/THPO and any Indian tribe upon whose tribal lands an undertaking
occurs or affects historic properties, determine which should be consulting
parties.
(g) Expediting consultation. A
consultation by the agency official with the SHPO/THPO and other consulting
parties may address multiple steps in §§ 800.3 through 800.6 where the agency
official and the SHPO/THPO agree it is appropriate as long as the consulting
parties and the public have an adequate opportunity to express their views as
provided in § 800.2(d).
§
800.4 Identification of historic properties.
(a) Determine scope of identification efforts. In consultation with the SHPO/THPO, the
agency official shall:
(1) Determine and
document the area of potential effects, as defined in § 800.16(d);
(2) Review existing
information on historic properties within the area of potential effects,
including any data concerning possible historic properties not yet identified;
(3) Seek information, as
appropriate, from consulting parties, and other individuals and organizations
likely to have knowledge of, or concerns with, historic properties in the area,
and identify issues relating to the undertaking's potential effects on historic
properties; and
(4) Gather information
from any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization identified pursuant to §
800.3(f) to assist in identifying properties, including those located off
tribal lands, which may be of religious and cultural significance to them and
may be eligible for the National Register, recognizing that an Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization may be reluctant to divulge specific information
regarding the location, nature, and activities associated with such sites. The agency official should address concerns
raised about confidentiality pursuant to § 800.11(c).
(b) Identify historic properties. Based on the information gathered under paragraph (a) of this section,
and in consultation with the SHPO/THPO and any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization that might attach
religious and cultural significance to properties within the area of potential
effects, the agency official shall take the steps necessary to identify
historic properties within the area of potential effects.
(1) Level of effort. The agency
official shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to carry out appropriate
identification efforts, which may include background research, consultation,
oral history interviews, sample field investigation, and field survey. The
agency official shall take into account past planning, research and studies,
the magnitude and nature of the undertaking and the degree of Federal
involvement, the nature and extent of potential effects on historic properties, and the likely nature and
location of historic properties within the area of potential effects. The Secretary's Standards and Guidelines for
Identification provide guidance on this subject. The agency official should also consider other applicable
professional, State, tribal and local laws, standards and guidelines. The agency official shall take into account
any confidentiality concerns raised by Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian
organizations during the identification process.
(2) Phased identification and evaluation. Where alternatives under consideration consist of corridors or large land areas, or where
access to properties is restricted, the agency official may use a phased
process to conduct identification and evaluation efforts. The agency official may also defer final
identification and evaluation of historic properties if it is specifically
provided for in a memorandum of agreement executed pursuant to § 800.6, a
programmatic agreement executed pursuant to § 800.14 (b), or the documents used
by an agency official to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act
pursuant to § 800.8. The process should
establish the likely presence of historic properties within the area of
potential effects for each alternative or inaccessible area through background
research, consultation and an appropriate level of field investigation, taking
into account the number of alternatives under consideration, the magnitude of
the undertaking and its likely effects, and the views of the SHPO/THPO and any
other consulting parties. As specific
aspects or locations of an alternative are refined or access is gained, the
agency official shall proceed with the identification and evaluation of
historic properties in accordance with paragraphs (b)(1) and (c) of this
section.
(c) Evaluate historic significance.
(1) Apply National Register criteria. In consultation with the SHPO/THPO and any Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization that attaches religious and cultural significance to
identified properties and guided by the Secretary's Standards and Guidelines
for Evaluation, the agency official shall apply the National Register criteria
(36 CFR part 63) to properties identified within the area of potential effects
that have not been previously evaluated for National Register eligibility. The passage of time, changing perceptions of
significance, or incomplete prior evaluations may require the agency official
to reevaluate properties previously determined eligible or ineligible. The agency official shall acknowledge that
Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations possess special expertise in
assessing the eligibility of historic properties that may possess religious and
cultural significance to them.
(2) Determine whether a property is eligible. If the agency official determines any of the National Register
criteria are met and the SHPO/THPO agrees, the property shall be considered
eligible for the National Register for section 106 purposes. If the agency official determines the
criteria are not met and the SHPO/THPO agrees, the property shall be considered
not eligible. If the agency official and the SHPO/THPO do not agree, or if the
Council or the Secretary so request, the agency official shall obtain a determination
of eligibility from the Secretary pursuant to 36 CFR part 63. If an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization that attaches religious and cultural significance to a property
off tribal lands does not agree, it may ask the Council to request the agency
official to obtain a determination of eligibility.
(d) Results of identification and evaluation.
(1) No historic properties affected. If the agency official finds that
either there are no historic properties present or there are historic
properties present but the undertaking will have no effect upon them as defined
in § 800.16(i), the agency official shall provide documentation of this finding, as set forth in § 800.11(d), to
the SHPO/THPO. The agency official shall notify all consulting parties, including
Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, and make the documentation
available for public inspection prior to approving the undertaking.
(i) If the SHPO/THPO, or
the Council if it has entered the section 106 process, does not object within 30
days of receipt of an adequately documented finding, the agency official's
responsibilities under section 106 are fulfilled.
(ii)
If the SHPO/THPO objects within 30 days of receipt of an adequately documented
finding, the agency official shall either consult with the objecting party to
resolve the disagreement, or forward the finding and supporting documentation
to the Council and request that the Council review the finding pursuant to
paragraphs (d)(1)(iv)(A) through (d)(1)(iv)(C) of this section. When an agency
official forwards such requests for review to the Council, the agency official
shall concurrently notify all consulting parties that such a request has been
made and make the request documentation available to the public.
(iii)
During the SHPO/THPO 30 day review period, the Council may object to the
finding and provide its opinion regarding the finding to the agency official
and, if the Council determines the issue warrants it, the head of the agency. A
Council decision to provide its opinion to the head of an agency shall be
guided by the criteria in appendix A to this part. The agency shall then
proceed according to paragraphs (d)(1)(iv)(B) and (d)(1)(iv)(C) of this
section.
(iv)(A) Upon receipt of
the request under paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section, the Council will have
30 days in which to review the finding and provide the agency official and, if
the Council determines the issue warrants it, the head of the agency with the
Council's opinion regarding the finding. A Council decision to provide its
opinion to the head of an agency shall be guided by the criteria in appendix A
to this part. If the Council does not respond within 30 days of receipt of the
request, the agency official's responsibilities under section 106 are
fulfilled.
(B) The person to whom
the Council addresses its opinion (the agency official or the head of the
agency) shall take into account the Council's opinion before the agency reaches
a final decision on the finding.
(C) The person to whom
the Council addresses its opinion (the agency official or the head of the
agency) shall then prepare a summary of the decision that contains the
rationale for the decision and evidence of consideration of the Council's
opinion, and provide it to the Council, the SHPO/THPO, and the consulting
parties. The head of the agency may delegate his or her duties under this
paragraph to the agency's senior policy official. If the agency official's
initial finding will be revised, the agency official shall proceed in
accordance with the revised finding. If the final decision of the agency is to
affirm the initial agency finding of no historic properties affected, once the
summary of the decision has been sent to the Council, the SHPO/THPO, and the
consulting parties, the agency official's responsibilities under section 106
are fulfilled.
(D) The Council shall
retain a record of agency responses to Council opinions on their findings of no
historic properties affected. The Council shall make this information available
to the public.
(2) Historic properties affected. If the agency official finds that there are historic properties which may be
affected by the undertaking, the agency official shall notify all consulting
parties, including Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations, invite their
views on the effects and assess adverse effects, if any, in accordance with §
800.5.
§
800.5 Assessment of adverse effects.
(a) Apply criteria of adverse effect. In consultation with the SHPO/THPO and any Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization that attaches religious and cultural significance to
identified historic properties, the agency official shall apply the criteria of
adverse effect to historic properties within the area of potential
effects. The agency official shall
consider any views concerning such effects which have been provided by
consulting parties and the public.
(1) Criteria of adverse effect. An adverse effect is found when an undertaking may alter, directly or
indirectly, any of the characteristics of a historic property that qualify the property
for inclusion in the National Register in a manner that would diminish the
integrity of the property's location, design, setting, materials, workmanship,
feeling, or association. Consideration
shall be given to all qualifying characteristics of a historic property,
including those that may have been identified subsequent to the original
evaluation of the property's eligibility for the National Register. Adverse effects may include reasonably
foreseeable effects caused by the undertaking that may occur later in time, be
farther removed in distance or be cumulative.
(2) Examples of adverse effects. Adverse effects on historic properties include, but are not limited to:
(i) Physical destruction
of or damage to all or part of the property;
(ii) Alteration of a
property, including restoration, rehabilitation, repair, maintenance,
stabilization, hazardous material remediation and provision of handicapped
access, that is not consistent with the Secretary’s Standards for the Treatment
of Historic Properties (36 CFR part 68) and applicable guidelines;
(iii) Removal of the
property from its historic location;
(iv) Change of the
character of the property’s use or of physical features within the property's
setting that contribute to its historic significance;
(v) Introduction of
visual, atmospheric or audible elements that diminish the integrity of the
property's significant historic features;
(vi) Neglect of a
property which causes its deterioration, except where such neglect and
deterioration are recognized qualities of a property of religious and cultural
significance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization; and
(vii) Transfer, lease,
or sale of property out of Federal ownership or control without adequate and
legally enforceable restrictions or conditions to ensure long-term preservation
of the property's historic significance.
(3) Phased application of criteria. Where alternatives under consideration consist of corridors or large
land areas, or where access to properties is restricted, the agency official
may use a phased process in applying the criteria of adverse effect consistent
with phased identification and evaluation efforts conducted pursuant to §
800.4(b)(2).
(b) Finding of no adverse effect. The agency official, in consultation with the SHPO/THPO, may propose a
finding of no adverse effect when the undertaking's effects do not meet the
criteria of paragraph (a)(1) of this section or the undertaking is modified or
conditions are imposed, such as the subsequent review of plans for rehabilitation
by the SHPO/THPO to ensure consistency with the Secretary’s Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties (36 CFR part 68) and applicable guidelines, to
avoid adverse effects.
(c) Consulting party review. If
the agency official proposes a finding of no adverse effect, the agency
official shall notify all consulting parties of the finding and provide them
with the documentation specified in § 800.11(e). The SHPO/THPO shall have 30
days from receipt to review the finding.
(1) Agreement with, or no objection to, finding. Unless the Council is
reviewing the finding pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the agency
official may proceed after the close of the 30 day review period if the
SHPO/THPO has agreed with the finding or has not provided a response, and no
consulting party has objected. The agency official shall then carry out the
undertaking in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(2) Disagreement with finding.
(i)
If within the 30 day review period the SHPO/THPO or any consulting party
notifies the agency official in writing that it disagrees with the finding and
specifies the reasons for the disagreement in the notification, the agency
official shall either consult with the party to resolve the disagreement, or
request the Council to review the finding pursuant to paragraphs (c)(3)(i) and
(c)(3)(ii) of this section. The agency official shall include with such request
the documentation specified in § 800.11(e). The agency official shall also
concurrently notify all consulting parties that such a submission has been made
and make the submission documentation available to the public.
(ii) If within the 30
day review period the Council provides the agency official and, if the Council
determines the issue warrants it, the head of the agency, with a written
opinion objecting to the finding, the agency shall then proceed according to
paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section. A Council decision to provide its opinion
to the head of an agency shall be guided by the criteria in appendix A to this
part.
(iii) The agency
official should seek the concurrence of any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization that has made known to the agency official that it attaches
religious and cultural significance to a historic property subject to the finding.
If such Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization disagrees with the
finding, it may within the 30 day review period specify the reasons for
disagreeing with the finding and request the Council to review and object to
the finding pursuant to paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section.
(3) Council review of findings.
(i) When a finding is
submitted to the Council pursuant to paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section, the
Council shall review the finding and provide the agency official and, if the
Council determines the issue warrants it, the head of the agency with its
opinion as to whether the adverse effect criteria have been correctly applied.
A Council decision to provide its opinion to the head of an agency shall be
guided by the criteria in appendix A to this part. The Council will provide its
opinion within 15 days of receiving the documented finding from the agency
official. The Council at its discretion may extend that time period for 15
days, in which case it shall notify the agency of such extension prior to the
end of the initial 15 day period. If the Council does not respond within the
applicable time period, the agency official's responsibilities under section
106 are fulfilled.
(ii)(A) The person to
whom the Council addresses its opinion (the agency official or the head of the
agency) shall take into account the Council's opinion in reaching a final
decision on the finding.
(B) The person to whom
the Council addresses its opinion (the agency official or the head of the
agency) shall prepare a summary of the decision that contains the rationale for
the decision and evidence of consideration of the Council's opinion, and
provide it to the Council, the SHPO/THPO, and the consulting parties. The head
of the agency may delegate his or her duties under this paragraph to the
agency's senior policy official. If the agency official's initial finding will
be revised, the agency official shall proceed in accordance with the revised
finding. If the final decision of the agency is to affirm the initial finding of
no adverse effect, once the summary of the decision has been sent to the
Council, the SHPO/THPO, and the consulting parties, the agency official's
responsibilities under section 106 are fulfilled.
(C) The Council shall
retain a record of agency responses to Council opinions on their findings of no
adverse effects. The Council shall make this information available to the
public.
(d) Results of assessment.
(1) No adverse effect. The
agency official shall maintain a record of the finding and provide information
on the finding to the public on request, consistent with the confidentiality
provisions of § 800.11(c). Implementation of the undertaking in accordance with the finding as
documented fulfills the agency official's responsibilities under section 106 and
this part. If the agency official will
not conduct the undertaking as proposed in the finding, the agency official
shall reopen consultation under paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) Adverse effect. If an
adverse effect is found, the agency official shall consult further to resolve
the adverse effect pursuant to § 800.6.
§
800.6 Resolution of adverse effects.
(a) Continue consultation. The
agency official shall consult with the SHPO/THPO and other consulting parties,
including Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, to develop and
evaluate alternatives or modifications to the undertaking that could avoid,
minimize or mitigate adverse effects on historic properties.
(1) Notify the Council and determine Council participation. The agency official shall notify the Council
of the adverse effect finding by providing the documentation specified in §
800.11(e).
(i) The notice shall
invite the Council to participate in the consultation when:
(A) The agency official
wants the Council to participate;
(B) The undertaking has
an adverse effect upon a National Historic Landmark; or
(C) A programmatic
agreement under § 800.14(b) will be prepared;
(ii) The SHPO/THPO, an
Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization, or any other consulting party may
at any time independently request the Council to participate in the
consultation.
(iii) The Council shall
advise the agency official and all consulting parties whether it will
participate within 15 days of receipt of notice or other request. Prior to entering the process, the Council
shall provide written notice to the agency official and the consulting parties
that its decision to participate meets the criteria set forth in appendix A to
this part. The Council shall also advise
the head of the agency of its decision to enter the process. Consultation with Council participation is
conducted in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(iv) If the Council does
not join the consultation, the agency official shall proceed with consultation
in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(2) Involve consulting parties. In addition to the consulting parties identified under § 800.3(f), the
agency official, the SHPO/THPO and the Council, if participating, may agree to
invite other individuals or organizations to become consulting parties. The
agency official shall invite any individual or organization that will assume a
specific role or responsibility in a memorandum of agreement to participate as
a consulting party.
(3) Provide documentation. The
agency official shall provide to all consulting parties the documentation
specified in § 800.11(e), subject to the confidentiality provisions of §
800.11(c), and such other documentation
as may be developed during the consultation to resolve adverse effects.
(4) Involve the public. The agency official shall make information
available to the public, including the documentation specified in § 800.11(e),
subject to the confidentiality provisions of § 800.11(c). The agency official shall provide an
opportunity for members of the public to express their views on resolving
adverse effects of the undertaking. The
agency official should use appropriate mechanisms, taking into account the
magnitude of the undertaking and the nature of its effects upon historic
properties, the likely effects on historic properties, and the relationship of
the Federal involvement to the undertaking to ensure that the public's views are considered in the
consultation. The agency official
should also consider the extent of notice and information concerning historic
preservation issues afforded the public at earlier steps in the section 106
process to determine the appropriate level of public involvement when resolving
adverse effects so that the standards of § 800.2(d) are met.
(5) Restrictions on disclosure of information. Section 304 of the act and other authorities
may limit the disclosure of information under paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4) of
this section. If an Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization objects to the disclosure of information or if the
agency official believes that there are other reasons to withhold information,
the agency official shall comply with § 800.11(c) regarding the disclosure of
such information.
(b) Resolve adverse effects.
(1) Resolution without the Council.
(i) The agency official shall consult with the
SHPO/THPO and other consulting parties to seek ways to avoid, minimize or
mitigate the adverse effects.
(ii) The agency official
may use standard treatments established by the Council under § 800.14(d) as a
basis for a memorandum of agreement.
(iii) If the Council
decides to join the consultation, the agency official shall follow paragraph
(b)(2) of this section.
(iv) If the agency
official and the SHPO/THPO agree on how the adverse effects will be resolved,
they shall execute a memorandum of agreement. The agency official must submit a copy of the executed memorandum of
agreement, along with the documentation specified in § 800.11(f), to the
Council prior to approving the undertaking in order to meet the requirements of
section 106 and this subpart.
(v) If the agency
official, and the SHPO/THPO fail to agree on the terms of a memorandum of
agreement, the agency official shall request the Council to join the
consultation and provide the Council with the documentation set forth in §
800.11(g). If the Council decides to
join the consultation, the agency official shall proceed in accordance with
paragraph (b)(2) of this section. If the Council decides not to join the consultation,
the Council will notify the agency and proceed to comment in accordance with §
800.7(c).
(2) Resolution with Council participation. If the Council decides to
participate in the consultation, the agency official shall consult with the
SHPO/THPO, the Council, and other consulting parties, including Indian tribes
and Native Hawaiian organizations under § 800.2(c)(3), to seek ways to avoid,
minimize or mitigate the adverse effects. If the agency official, the SHPO/THPO, and the Council agree on how the
adverse effects will be resolved, they shall execute a memorandum of agreement.
(c) Memorandum of agreement. A
memorandum of agreement executed and implemented pursuant to this section
evidences the agency official's compliance with section 106 and this part and
shall govern the undertaking and all of its parts. The agency official shall ensure that the undertaking is carried
out in accordance with the memorandum of agreement.
(1) Signatories. The
signatories have sole authority to execute, amend or terminate the agreement in
accordance with this subpart.
(i) The agency official
and the SHPO/THPO are the signatories to a memorandum of agreement executed
pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(ii) The agency
official, the SHPO/THPO, and the Council are the signatories to a memorandum of
agreement executed pursuant to paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(iii) The agency
official and the Council are signatories to a memorandum of agreement executed
pursuant to § 800.7(a)(2).
(2) Invited signatories.
(i) The agency official
may invite additional parties to be signatories to a memorandum of
agreement. Any such party that signs
the memorandum of agreement shall have the same rights with regard to seeking
amendment or termination of the memorandum of agreement as other signatories.
(ii) The agency official
may invite an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that attaches
religious and cultural significance to historic properties located off tribal
lands to be a signatory to a memorandum of agreement concerning such
properties.
(iii) The agency official should invite any party that
assumes a responsibility under a memorandum of agreement to be a signatory.
(iv) The refusal of any
party invited to become a signatory to a memorandum of agreement pursuant to
paragraph (c)(2) of this section does not invalidate the memorandum of
agreement.
(3) Concurrence by others. The agency official may invite all
consulting parties to concur in the memorandum of agreement. The signatories
may agree to invite others to concur. The refusal of any party invited to concur in the memorandum of
agreement does not invalidate the memorandum of agreement.
(4) Reports on implementation. Where the signatories agree it is appropriate, a memorandum of agreement
shall include a provision for monitoring and reporting on its implementation.
(5) Duration. A memorandum of
agreement shall include provisions for termination and for reconsideration of
terms if the undertaking has not been implemented within a specified time.
(6) Discoveries. Where the
signatories agree it is appropriate, a memorandum of agreement shall include
provisions to deal with the subsequent discovery or identification of
additional historic properties affected by the undertaking.
(7) Amendments. The signatories
to a memorandum of agreement may amend it. If the Council was not a signatory to the original agreement and the
signatories execute an amended agreement, the agency official shall file it
with the Council.
(8) Termination. If any
signatory determines that the terms of a memorandum of agreement cannot be or
are not being carried out, the signatories shall consult to seek amendment of
the agreement. If the agreement is not
amended, any signatory may terminate it. The agency official shall either execute a memorandum of agreement with
signatories under paragraph (c)(1) of this section or request the comments of
the Council under § 800.7(a).
(9) Copies. The agency official
shall provide each consulting party with a copy of any memorandum of agreement
executed pursuant to this subpart.
§
800.7 Failure to resolve adverse effects.
(a) Termination of consultation. After consulting to resolve adverse effects pursuant to § 800.6(b)(2),
the agency official, the SHPO/THPO, or the Council may determine that further
consultation will not be productive and terminate consultation. Any party that terminates consultation shall
notify the other consulting parties and provide them the reasons for
terminating in writing.
(1) If the agency official terminates
consultation, the head of the agency or an Assistant Secretary or other officer
with major department-wide or agency-wide responsibilities shall request that
the Council comment pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section and shall notify
all consulting parties of the request.
(2) If the SHPO terminates consultation, the
agency official and the Council may execute a memorandum of agreement without
the SHPO’s involvement.
(3) If a THPO terminates consultation regarding
an undertaking occurring on or affecting historic properties on its tribal
lands, the Council shall comment pursuant to paragraph (c) of this
section.
(4) If the Council terminates consultation, the
Council shall notify the agency official, the agency’s Federal preservation
officer and all consulting parties of the termination and comment under
paragraph (c) of this section. The
Council may consult with the agency’s Federal preservation officer prior to
terminating consultation to seek to resolve issues concerning the undertaking
and its effects on historic properties.
(b) Comments without termination. The Council may determine that it is appropriate to provide additional
advisory comments upon an undertaking for which a memorandum of agreement will
be executed. The Council shall provide
them to the agency official when it executes the memorandum of agreement.
(c) Comments by the Council.
(1) Preparation. The Council
shall provide an opportunity for the agency official, all consulting parties,
and the public to provide their views within the time frame for developing its
comments. Upon request of the Council,
the agency official shall provide additional existing information concerning
the undertaking and assist the Council in arranging an onsite inspection and an
opportunity for public participation.
(2) Timing. The Council shall transmit
its comments within 45 days of receipt of a request under paragraph (a)(1) or
(a)(3) of this section or § 800.8(c)(3), or termination by the Council under §
800.6(b)(1)(v) or paragraph (a)(4) of this section, unless otherwise agreed to
by the agency official.
(3) Transmittal. The Council
shall provide its comments to the head of the agency requesting comment with
copies to the agency official, the agency's Federal preservation officer, all
consulting parties, and others as appropriate.
(4) Response to Council comment. The head of the agency shall take into account the Council's comments in
reaching a final decision on the undertaking. Section 110(l) of the act directs that the head of the agency shall
document this decision and may not delegate his or her responsibilities
pursuant to section 106. Documenting the agency head's decision shall include:
(i) Preparing a summary
of the decision that contains the rationale for the decision and evidence of
consideration of the Council's comments and providing it to the Council prior
to approval of the undertaking;
(ii) Providing a copy of
the summary to all consulting parties; and
(iii) Notifying the
public and making the record available for public inspection.
§
800.8 Coordination With the National Environmental
Policy Act.
(a) General principles.
(1) Early coordination. Federal agencies are encouraged to coordinate
compliance with section 106 and the procedures in this part with any steps
taken to meet the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Agencies should consider their
section 106 responsibilities as early as possible in the NEPA process, and plan
their public participation, analysis, and review in such a way that they can
meet the purposes and requirements of both statutes in a timely and efficient
manner. The determination of whether an
undertaking is a “major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of
the human environment,” and therefore requires preparation of an environmental
impact statement (EIS) under NEPA, should include consideration of the
undertaking's likely effects on historic properties. A finding of adverse effect on a historic property does not
necessarily require an EIS under NEPA.
(2) Consulting party roles. SHPO/THPOs, Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, other
consulting parties, and organizations and individuals who may be concerned with
the possible effects of an agency action on historic properties should be
prepared to consult with agencies early in the NEPA process, when the purpose
of and need for the proposed action as well as the widest possible range of
alternatives are under consideration.
(3) Inclusion of historic preservation issues. Agency officials should ensure that
preparation of an environmental assessment (EA) and finding of no significant
impact (FONSI) or an EIS and record of decision (ROD) includes appropriate
scoping, identification of historic properties, assessment of effects upon
them, and consultation leading to resolution of any adverse effects.
(b) Actions categorically excluded under NEPA. If a project, activity or program is
categorically excluded from NEPA review under an agency's NEPA procedures, the
agency official shall determine if it still qualifies as an undertaking
requiring review under section 106 pursuant to § 800.3(a). If so, the agency official shall proceed
with section 106 review in accordance with the procedures in this subpart.
(c) Use of the NEPA process for section 106 purposes. An agency official may use the process and
documentation required for the preparation of an EA/FONSI or an EIS/ROD to
comply with section 106 in lieu of the procedures set forth in §§ 800.3 through
800.6 if the agency official has notified in advance the SHPO/THPO and the
Council that it intends to do so and the following standards are met.
(1) Standards for developing environmental documents to comply with Section
106. During preparation of the EA
or draft EIS (DEIS) the agency official shall:
(i) Identify consulting
parties either pursuant to § 800.3(f) or through the NEPA scoping process with
results consistent with § 800.3(f);
(ii) Identify historic
properties and assess the effects of the undertaking on such properties in a
manner consistent with the standards and criteria of §§ 800.4 through 800.5, provided
that the scope and timing of these steps may be phased to reflect the agency
official's consideration of project alternatives in the NEPA process and the
effort is commensurate with the assessment of other environmental factors;
(iii) Consult regarding the effects of the
undertaking on historic properties with the SHPO/THPO, Indian tribes and Native
Hawaiian organizations that might attach religious and cultural significance to
affected historic properties, other consulting parties, and the Council, where
appropriate, during NEPA scoping, environmental analysis, and the preparation
of NEPA documents;
(iv) Involve the public in accordance with the
agency's published NEPA procedures; and
(v) Develop in
consultation with identified consulting parties alternatives and proposed
measures that might avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects of the
undertaking on historic properties and describe them in the EA or DEIS.
(2) Review of environmental documents.
(i) The agency official
shall submit the EA, DEIS or EIS to the SHPO/THPO, Indian tribes and Native
Hawaiian organizations that might attach religious and cultural significance to
affected historic properties, and other consulting parties prior to or when
making the document available for public comment. If the document being prepared is a DEIS or EIS, the agency
official shall also submit it to the Council.
(ii) Prior to or within
the time allowed for public comment on the document, a SHPO/THPO, an Indian
tribe or Native Hawaiian organization, another consulting party or the Council
may object to the agency official that preparation of the EA, DEIS or EIS has
not met the standards set forth in paragraph (c)(1) of this section or that the
substantive resolution of the effects on historic properties proposed in an EA,
DEIS or EIS is inadequate. If the agency official receives such an objection,
the agency official shall refer the matter to the Council.
(3) Resolution of objections. Within 30 days of the agency official's
referral of an objection under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section, the
Council shall review the objection and notify the agency as to its opinion on
the objection.
(i)
If the Council agrees with the objection:
(A)
The Council shall provide the agency official and, if the Council determines
the issue warrants it, the head of the agency with the Council's opinion
regarding the objection. A Council decision to provide its opinion to the head
of an agency shall be guided by the criteria in appendix A to this part. The
person to whom the Council addresses its opinion (the agency official or the
head of the agency) shall take into account the Council's opinion in reaching a
final decision on the issue of the objection.
(B) The person to whom
the Council addresses its opinion (the agency official or the head of the
agency) shall prepare a summary of the decision that contains the rationale for
the decision and evidence of consideration of the Council's opinion, and
provide it to the Council. The head of the agency may delegate his or her duties
under this paragraph to the agency's senior Policy Official. If the agency
official's initial decision regarding the matter that is the subject of the
objection will be revised, the agency official shall proceed in accordance with
the revised decision. If the final decision of the agency is to affirm the
initial agency decision, once the summary of the final decision has been sent
to the Council, the agency official shall continue its compliance with this
section.
(ii) If the Council
disagrees with the objection, the Council shall so notify the agency official,
in which case the agency official shall continue its compliance with this
section.
(iii) If the Council
fails to respond to the objection within the 30 day period, the agency official
shall continue its compliance with this section.
(4) Approval of the undertaking. If the agency official has found,
during the preparation of an EA or EIS that the effects of an undertaking on
historic properties are adverse, the agency official shall develop measures in
the EA, DEIS, or EIS to avoid, minimize, or mitigate such effects in accordance
with paragraph (c)(1)(v) of this section. The agency official's responsibilities under section 106 and the
procedures in this subpart shall then be satisfied when either:
(i) a binding commitment
to such proposed measures is incorporated in
(A) the ROD, if such
measures were proposed in a DEIS or EIS; or
(B) an MOA drafted in
compliance with § 800.6(c); or
(ii) the Council has
commented under § 800.7 and received the agency's response to such comments.
(5) Modification of the undertaking. If the undertaking is modified
after approval of the FONSI or the ROD in a manner that changes the undertaking
or alters its effects on historic properties, or if the agency official fails
to ensure that the measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects (as
specified in either the FONSI or the ROD, or in the binding commitment adopted
pursuant to paragraph (c)(4) of this section) are carried out, the agency
official shall notify the Council and all consulting parties that supplemental
environmental documents will be prepared in compliance with NEPA or that the
procedures in §§ 800.3 through 800.6 will be followed as necessary.
§
800.9 Council review of section 106 compliance.
(a) Assessment of agency official compliance for individual undertakings. The Council may provide to the agency
official its advisory opinion regarding the substance of any finding,
determination or decision or regarding the adequacy of the agency official's
compliance with the procedures under this part. The Council may provide such advice at any time at the request of
any individual, agency or organization or on its own initiative. The agency
official shall consider the views of the Council in reaching a decision on the
matter in question.
(b) Agency foreclosure of the Council's opportunity to comment. Where an agency official has failed to
complete the requirements of section 106 in accordance with the procedures in
this part prior to the approval of an undertaking, the Council's opportunity to
comment may be foreclosed. The Council
may review a case to determine whether a foreclosure has occurred. The Council shall notify the agency official
and the agency's Federal preservation officer and allow 30 days for the agency
official to provide information as to whether foreclosure has occurred. If the Council determines foreclosure has
occurred, the Council shall transmit the determination to the agency official
and the head of the agency. The Council shall also make the determination
available to the public and any parties known to be interested in the
undertaking and its effects upon historic properties.
(c) Intentional adverse effects by applicants.
(1) Agency responsibility. Section 110(k) of the act prohibits a Federal agency from granting a
loan, loan guarantee, permit, license or other assistance to an applicant who,
with intent to avoid the requirements of section 106, has intentionally
significantly adversely affected a historic property to which the grant would
relate, or having legal power to prevent it, has allowed such significant
adverse effect to occur, unless the agency, after consultation with the
Council, determines that circumstances justify granting such assistance despite
the adverse effect created or permitted by the applicant. Guidance issued by the Secretary pursuant to
section 110 of the act governs its implementation.
(2) Consultation with the Council. When an agency official determines, based on the actions of an
applicant, that section 110(k) is applicable and that circumstances may justify
granting the assistance, the agency official shall notify the Council and
provide documentation specifying the circumstances under which the adverse
effects to the historic property occurred and the degree of damage to the
integrity of the property. This
documentation shall include any views obtained from the applicant,
SHPO/THPO, an Indian tribe if the
undertaking occurs on or affects historic properties on tribal lands, and other
parties known to be interested in the undertaking.
(i) Within thirty days of receiving the agency
official's notification, unless otherwise agreed to by the agency official, the
Council shall provide the agency official with its opinion as to whether
circumstances justify granting assistance to the applicant and any possible
mitigation of the adverse effects.
(ii) The agency official shall consider the
Council's opinion in making a decision on whether to grant assistance to the
applicant, and shall notify the Council, the SHPO/THPO, and other parties known
to be interested in the undertaking prior to granting the assistance.
(3) Compliance with Section 106. If an agency official, after consulting with the Council, determines to
grant the assistance, the agency official shall comply with §§ 800.3 through
800.6 to take into account the effects of the undertaking on any historic
properties.
(d) Evaluation of Section 106 operations. The Council may evaluate the operation of the section 106 process
by periodic reviews of how participants have fulfilled their legal
responsibilities and how effectively the outcomes reached advance the purposes
of the act.
(1) Information from participants. Section 203 of the act authorizes the Council to obtain information from
Federal agencies necessary to conduct evaluation of the section 106
process. The agency official shall make
documentation of agency policies, operating procedures and actions taken to
comply with section 106 available to the Council upon request. The Council may request available
information and documentation from other participants in the section 106
process.
(2) Improving the operation of section 106. Based upon any evaluation of the section 106 process, the Council
may make recommendations to participants, the heads of Federal agencies, and
the Secretary of actions to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the
process. Where the Council determines
that an agency official or a SHPO/THPO has failed to properly carry out the
responsibilities assigned under the process in this part, the Council may
participate in individual case reviews conducted under such process in addition
to the SHPO/THPO for such period that it determines is necessary to improve
performance or correct deficiencies. If
the Council finds a pattern of failure by a Federal agency in carrying out its
responsibilities under section 106, the Council may review the policies and
programs of the agency related to historic preservation pursuant to section
202(a)(6) of the act and recommend methods to improve the effectiveness,
coordination, and consistency of those policies and programs with section 106.
§
800.10 Special requirements for protecting National Historic Landmarks.
(a) Statutory requirement. Section 110(f) of the act requires that the agency official, to the
maximum extent possible, undertake such planning and actions as may be
necessary to minimize harm to any National Historic Landmark that may be directly
and adversely affected by an undertaking. When commenting on such undertakings,
the Council shall use the process set forth in §§ 800.6 through 800.7 and give
special consideration to protecting National Historic Landmarks as specified in
this section.
(b) Resolution of adverse effects. The agency official shall request
the Council to participate in any consultation to resolve adverse effects on
National Historic Landmarks conducted under § 800.6.
(c) Involvement of the Secretary. The agency official shall notify the
Secretary of any consultation involving a National Historic Landmark and invite
the Secretary to participate in the consultation where there may be an adverse
effect. The Council may request a
report from the Secretary under section 213 of the act to assist in the
consultation.
(d) Report of outcome. When the
Council participates in consultation under this section, it shall report the
outcome of the section 106 process, providing its written comments or any
memoranda of agreement to which it is a signatory, to the Secretary and the
head of the agency responsible for the undertaking.
§
800.11 Documentation standards.
(a) Adequacy of documentation. The agency official shall ensure that a determination, finding, or
agreement under the procedures in this subpart is supported by sufficient
documentation to enable any reviewing parties to understand its basis. The agency official shall provide such
documentation to the extent permitted by law and within available funds. When an agency official is conducting phased
identification or evaluation under this subpart, the documentation standards
regarding description of historic properties may be applied flexibly. If the Council, or the SHPO/THPO when the Council
is not involved, determines the applicable documentation standards are not met,
the Council or the SHPO/THPO, as appropriate, shall notify the agency official
and specify the information needed to meet the standard. At the request of the agency official or any
of the consulting parties, the Council shall review any disputes over whether
documentation standards are met and provide its views to the agency official
and the consulting parties.
(b) Format. The agency official
may use documentation prepared to comply with other laws to fulfill the
requirements of the procedures in this subpart, if that documentation meets the
standards of this section.
(c) Confidentiality.
(1) Authority to withhold information. Section 304 of the act provides that the head of a Federal agency or
other public official receiving grant assistance pursuant to the act, after
consultation with the Secretary, shall withhold from public disclosure
information about the location, character, or ownership of a historic property
when disclosure may cause a significant invasion of privacy; risk harm to the
historic property; or impede the use of a traditional religious site by
practitioners. When the head of a
Federal agency or other public official has determined that information should
be withheld from the public pursuant to these criteria, the Secretary, in
consultation with such Federal agency head or official, shall determine who may
have access to the information for the purposes of carrying out the act.
(2) Consultation with the Council. When the information in question has been developed in the course of an
agency's compliance with this part, the Secretary shall consult with the
Council in reaching determinations on the withholding and release of
information. The Federal agency shall
provide the Council with available information, including views of the
SHPO/THPO, Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, related to the
confidentiality concern. The Council
shall advise the Secretary and the Federal agency within 30 days of receipt of
adequate documentation.
(3) Other authorities affecting confidentiality. Other Federal laws and program requirements
may limit public access to information concerning an undertaking and its
effects on historic properties. Where
applicable, those authorities shall govern public access to information
developed in the section 106 process and may authorize the agency official to
protect the privacy of non-governmental applicants.
(d) Finding of no historic properties affected. Documentation shall include:
(1) A description of the
undertaking, specifying the Federal involvement, and its area of potential
effects, including photographs, maps, drawings, as necessary;
(2) A description of the
steps taken to identify historic properties, including, as appropriate, efforts
to seek information pursuant to § 800.4(b); and
(3) The basis for
determining that no historic properties are present or affected.
(e) Finding of no adverse effect or adverse effect. Documentation shall include:
(1) A description of the
undertaking, specifying the Federal involvement, and its area of potential
effects, including photographs, maps, and drawings, as necessary;
(2) A description of the
steps taken to identify historic properties;
(3) A description of the
affected historic properties, including information on the characteristics that
qualify them for the National Register;
(4) A description of the
undertaking's effects on historic properties;
(5) An explanation of
why the criteria of adverse effect were found applicable or inapplicable,
including any conditions or future actions to avoid, minimize or mitigate
adverse effects; and
(6) Copies or summaries
of any views provided by consulting parties and the public.
(f) Memorandum of agreement. When a memorandum of agreement is filed with the Council, the documentation
shall include, any substantive revisions or additions to the documentation
provided the Council pursuant to § 800.6(a)(1), an evaluation of any measures
considered to avoid or minimize the undertaking's adverse effects and a summary
of the views of consulting parties and the public.
(g) Requests for comment without a memorandum of agreement. Documentation shall include:
(1) A description and
evaluation of any alternatives or mitigation measures that the agency official
proposes to resolve the undertaking's adverse effects;
(2) A description of any
reasonable alternatives or mitigation measures that were considered but not
chosen, and the reasons for their rejection;
(3) Copies or summaries
of any views submitted to the agency official concerning the adverse effects of
the undertaking on historic properties and alternatives to reduce or avoid
those effects; and
(4) Any substantive
revisions or additions to the documentation provided the Council pursuant to §
800.6(a)(1).
§
800.12 Emergency situations.
(a) Agency procedures. The
agency official, in consultation with the appropriate SHPOs/THPOs, affected
Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, and the Council, is encouraged
to develop procedures for taking historic properties into account during
operations which respond to a disaster or emergency declared by the President,
a tribal government, or the Governor of a State or which respond to other
immediate threats to life or property. If approved by the Council, the procedures shall govern the agency's
historic preservation responsibilities during any disaster or emergency in lieu
of §§ 800.3 through 800.6.
(b) Alternatives to agency procedures. In the event an agency official proposes an emergency undertaking as an
essential and immediate response to a disaster or emergency declared by the
President, a tribal government, or the Governor of a State or another immediate
threat to life or property, and the agency has not developed procedures
pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the agency official may comply with
section 106 by:
(1) Following a
programmatic agreement developed pursuant to § 800.14(b) that contains specific
provisions for dealing with historic properties in emergency situations; or
(2) Notifying the
Council, the appropriate SHPO/THPO and any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic
properties likely to be affected prior to the undertaking and affording them an
opportunity to comment within seven days of notification. If the agency official determines that
circumstances do not permit seven days for comment, the agency official shall
notify the Council, the SHPO/THPO and the Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization and invite any comments within the time available.
(c) Local governments responsible for section 106 compliance. When a local government official serves as
the agency official for section 106 compliance, paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section also apply to an imminent threat to public health or safety as a result
of a natural disaster or emergency declared by a local government's chief
executive officer or legislative body, provided that if the Council or
SHPO/THPO objects to the proposed action within seven days, the agency official
shall comply with §§ 800.3 through 800.6.
(d) Applicability. This section
applies only to undertakings that will be implemented within 30 days after the
disaster or emergency has been formally declared by the appropriate
authority. An agency may request an
extension of the period of applicability from the Council prior to the
expiration of the 30 days. Immediate
rescue and salvage operations conducted to preserve life or property are exempt
from the provisions of section 106 and this part.
§
800.13 Post-review discoveries.
(a) Planning for subsequent discoveries.
(1) Using a programmatic agreement. An agency official may develop a programmatic agreement pursuant to §
800.14(b) to govern the actions to be taken when historic properties are
discovered during the implementation of an undertaking.
(2) Using agreement documents. When the agency official's
identification efforts in accordance with § 800.4 indicate that historic
properties are likely to be discovered during implementation of an undertaking
and no programmatic agreement has been developed pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
of this section, the agency official shall include in any finding of no adverse
effect or memorandum of agreement a process to resolve any adverse effects upon such properties. Actions in conformance with the process
satisfy the agency official's responsibilities under section 106 and this part.
(b) Discoveries without prior planning. If historic properties are discovered or unanticipated effects on
historic properties found after the agency official has completed the section
106 process without establishing a process under paragraph (a) of this section,
the agency official shall make reasonable efforts to avoid, minimize or
mitigate adverse effects to such properties and:
(1) If the agency official
has not approved the undertaking or if construction on an approved undertaking
has not commenced, consult to resolve adverse effects pursuant to § 800.6; or
(2) If the agency
official, the SHPO/THPO and any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization
that might attach religious and cultural significance to the affected property
agree that such property is of value solely for its scientific, prehistoric,
historic or archeological data, the agency official may comply with the
Archeological and Historic Preservation Act instead of the procedures in this
part and provide the Council, the SHPO/THPO, and the Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization with a report on the actions within a reasonable time
after they are completed; or
(3) If the agency official
has approved the undertaking and construction has commenced, determine actions
that the agency official can take to resolve adverse effects, and notify the
SHPO/THPO, any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that might attach
religious and cultural significance to the affected property, and the Council
within 48 hours of the discovery. The
notification shall describe the agency official's assessment of National
Register eligibility of the property and proposed actions to resolve the
adverse effects. The SHPO/THPO, the
Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and the Council shall respond
within 48 hours of the notification. The agency official shall take into account their recommendations
regarding National Register eligibility and proposed actions, and then carry
out appropriate actions. The agency
official shall provide the SHPO/THPO, the Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization and the Council a report of the actions when they are completed.
(c) Eligibility of properties. The agency official, in consultation with the SHPO/THPO, may assume a
newly-discovered property to be eligible for the National Register for purposes
of section 106. The agency official
shall specify the National Register criteria used to assume the property's eligibility
so that information can be used in the resolution of adverse effects.
(d) Discoveries on tribal lands. If historic properties are discovered on tribal lands, or there are
unanticipated effects on historic properties found on tribal lands, after the
agency official has completed the section 106 process without establishing a
process under paragraph (a) of this section and construction has commenced, the
agency official shall comply with applicable tribal regulations and procedures
and obtain the concurrence of the Indian tribe on the proposed action.
Subpart
C-Program Alternatives
§
800.14 Federal agency program
alternatives.
(a) Alternate procedures. An
agency official may develop procedures to implement section 106 and substitute
them for all or part of subpart B of this part if they are consistent with the
Council's regulations pursuant to section 110(a)(2)(E) of the act.
(1) Development of procedures. The agency official shall consult with the Council, the National
Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers or individual SHPO/THPOs, as
appropriate, and Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, as specified
in paragraph (f) of this section, in the development of alternate procedures,
publish notice of the availability of proposed alternate procedures in the
Federal Register and take other appropriate steps to seek public input during
the development of alternate procedures.
(2) Council review. The agency
official shall submit the proposed alternate procedures to the Council for a
60-day review period. If the Council
finds the procedures to be consistent with this part, it shall notify the
agency official and the agency official may adopt them as final alternate
procedures.
(3) Notice. The agency official shall notify the parties with which it
has consulted and publish notice of final alternate procedures in the Federal
Register.
(4) Legal effect. Alternate
procedures adopted pursuant to this subpart substitute for the Council's
regulations for the purposes of the agency's compliance with section 106,
except that where an Indian tribe has entered into an agreement with the
Council to substitute tribal historic preservation regulations for the
Council's regulations under section 101(d)(5) of the act, the agency shall
follow those regulations in lieu of the agency's procedures regarding
undertakings on tribal lands. Prior to
the Council entering into such agreements, the Council will provide Federal
agencies notice and opportunity to comment on the proposed substitute tribal regulations.
(b) Programmatic agreements. The Council and the agency official may negotiate a programmatic
agreement to govern the implementation of a particular program or the
resolution of adverse effects from certain complex project situations or multiple
undertakings.
(1) Use of programmatic agreements. A programmatic agreement may be used:
(i) When effects on
historic properties are similar and repetitive or are multi-State or regional
in scope;
(ii) When effects on
historic properties cannot be fully determined prior to approval of an
undertaking;
(iii) When nonfederal
parties are delegated major decisionmaking responsibilities;
(iv) Where routine
management activities are undertaken at Federal installations, facilities, or
other land-management units; or
(v) Where other
circumstances warrant a departure from the normal section 106 process.
(2) Developing programmatic agreements for agency programs.
(i) The consultation
shall involve, as appropriate, SHPO/THPOs, the National Conference of State
Historic Preservation Officers (NCSHPO), Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian
organizations, other Federal agencies, and members of the public. If the programmatic agreement has the
potential to affect historic properties on tribal lands or historic properties
of religious and cultural significance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization, the agency official shall also follow paragraph (f) of this
section.
(ii) Public Participation. The agency
official shall arrange for public participation appropriate to the subject
matter and the scope of the program and in accordance with subpart A of this
part. The agency official shall
consider the nature of the program and its likely effects on historic
properties and take steps to involve the individuals, organizations and
entities likely to be interested.
(iii) Effect. The programmatic agreement shall
take effect when executed by the Council, the agency official and the
appropriate SHPOs/THPOs when the programmatic agreement concerns a specific
region or the president of NCSHPO when NCSHPO has participated in the
consultation. A programmatic agreement
shall take effect on tribal lands only when the THPO, Indian tribe or a designated representative of the tribe is a
signatory to the agreement. Compliance
with the procedures established by an approved programmatic agreement satisfies
the agency's section 106 responsibilities for all individual undertakings of
the program covered by the agreement until it expires or is terminated by the
agency, the president of NCSHPO when a signatory, or the Council. Termination by an individual SHPO/THPO shall
only terminate the application of a regional programmatic agreement within the
jurisdiction of the SHPO/THPO. If a
THPO assumes the responsibilities of a SHPO pursuant to section 101(d)(2) of
the act and the SHPO is signatory to programmatic agreement, the THPO assumes
the role of a signatory, including the right to terminate a regional
programmatic agreement on lands under the jurisdiction of the tribe.
(iv) Notice. The agency official shall notify the parties with which it has consulted
that a programmatic agreement has been executed under paragraph (b) of this
section, provide appropriate public notice before it takes effect, and make any
internal agency procedures implementing the agreement readily available to the
Council, SHPO/THPOs, and the public.
(v) If the Council
determines that the terms of a programmatic agreement are not being carried
out, or if such an agreement is terminated, the agency official shall comply
with subpart B of this part with regard to individual undertakings of the
program covered by the agreement.
(3) Developing programmatic agreements for complex or multiple undertakings. Consultation to develop a programmatic
agreement for dealing with the potential adverse effects of complex projects or
multiple undertakings shall follow § 800.6. If consultation pertains to an activity involving multiple undertakings
and the parties fail to reach agreement, then the agency official shall comply
with the provisions of subpart B of this part for each individual undertaking.
(4) Prototype programmatic agreements. The Council may designate an agreement document as a prototype
programmatic agreement that may be used for the same type of program or
undertaking in more than one case or area. When an agency official uses such a prototype programmatic agreement,
the agency official may develop and execute the agreement with the appropriate
SHPO/THPO and the agreement shall become final without need for Council participation
in consultation or Council signature.
(c) Exempted categories.
(1) Criteria for establishing. The Council or an agency official may
propose a program or category of undertakings that may be exempted from review
under the provisions of subpart B of this part, if the program or category
meets the following criteria:
(i) The actions within
the program or category would otherwise qualify as "undertakings" as
defined in § 800.16;
(ii) The potential
effects of the undertakings within the program or category upon historic
properties are foreseeable and likely to be minimal or not adverse; and
(iii) Exemption of the
program or category is consistent with the purposes of the act.
(2) Public participation. The proponent of the exemption shall arrange
for public participation appropriate to the subject matter and the scope of the
exemption and in accordance with the standards in subpart A of this part. The
proponent of the exemption shall consider the nature of the exemption and its
likely effects on historic properties and take steps to involve individuals,
organizations and entities likely to be interested.
(3) Consultation with SHPOs/THPOs. The proponent of the exemption shall
notify and consider the views of the SHPOs/THPOs on the exemption.
(4) Consultation with Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations.
If the exempted program or category of undertakings has the potential to affect
historic properties on tribal lands or historic properties of religious and
cultural significance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization, the
Council shall follow the requirements for the agency official set forth in
paragraph (f) of this section.
(5) Council review of proposed exemptions. The Council shall review an
exemption proposal that is supported by documentation describing the program or
category for which the exemption is sought, demonstrating that the criteria of
paragraph (c)(1) of this section have been met, describing the methods used to
seek the views of the public, and summarizing any views submitted by the
SHPO/THPOs, the public, and any others consulted. Unless it requests further
information, the Council shall approve or reject the proposed exemption within
30 days of receipt, and thereafter notify the relevant agency official and
SHPO/THPOs of the decision. The decision shall be based on the consistency of
the exemption with the purposes of the act, taking into consideration the
magnitude of the exempted undertaking or program and the likelihood of
impairment of historic properties in accordance with section 214 of the act.
(6) Legal consequences. Any undertaking that falls within an approved
exempted program or category shall require no further review pursuant to
subpart B of this part, unless the agency official or the Council determines
that there are circumstances under which the normally excluded undertaking
should be reviewed under subpart B of this part.
(7) Termination. The Council may terminate an exemption at the request
of the agency official or when the Council determines that the exemption no
longer meets the criteria of paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The Council
shall notify the agency official 30 days before termination becomes effective.
(8) Notice. The proponent of the exemption shall publish notice of any
approved exemption in the Federal Register.
(1) Establishment. The Council,
on its own initiative or at the request of another party, may establish
standard methods for the treatment of a category of historic properties, a
category of undertakings, or a category of effects on historic properties to
assist Federal agencies in satisfying the requirements of subpart B of this
part. The Council shall publish notice
of standard treatments in the Federal Register.
(2) Public participation. The
Council shall arrange for public participation appropriate to the subject
matter and the scope of the standard treatment and consistent with subpart A of
this part. The Council shall consider
the nature of the standard treatment and its likely effects on historic properties
and the individuals, organizations and entities likely to be interested. Where an agency official has proposed a
standard treatment, the Council may request the agency official to arrange for
public involvement.
(3) Consultation with SHPOs/THPOs. The Council shall notify and consider the views of SHPOs/THPOs on the
proposed standard treatment.
(4) Consultation with Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations. If the proposed standard treatment has the
potential to affect historic properties on tribal lands or historic properties
of religious and cultural significance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization, the Council shall follow the requirements for the agency official
set forth in paragraph (f) of this section.
(5) Termination. The Council
may terminate a standard treatment by publication of a notice in the Federal
Register 30 days before the termination takes effect.
(e) Program comments. An agency
official may request the Council to comment on a category of undertakings in
lieu of conducting individual reviews under §§ 800.4 through 800.6. The Council may provide program comments at
its own initiative.
(1) Agency request. The agency
official shall identify the category of undertakings, specify the likely
effects on historic properties, specify the steps the agency official will take
to ensure that the effects are taken into account, identify the time period for
which the comment is requested and summarize any views submitted by the public.
(2) Public participation. The
agency official shall arrange for public participation appropriate to the
subject matter and the scope of the category and in accordance with the
standards in subpart A of this part. The agency official shall consider the nature of the undertakings and
their likely effects on historic properties and the individuals, organizations
and entities likely to be interested.
(3) Consultation with SHPOs/THPOs. The Council shall notify and
consider the views of SHPOs/THPOs on the proposed program comment.
(4) Consultation with Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations. If the program comment has the potential to
affect historic properties on tribal lands or historic properties of religious
and cultural significance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization,
the Council shall follow the requirements for the agency official set forth in
paragraph (f) of this section.
(5) Council action. Unless the
Council requests additional documentation, notifies the agency official that it
will decline to comment, or obtains the consent of the agency official to
extend the period for providing comment, the Council shall comment to the
agency official within 45 days of the request.
(i) If the Council
comments, the agency official shall take into account the comments of the
Council in carrying out the undertakings within the category and publish notice
in the Federal Register of the Council's comments and steps the agency will
take to ensure that effects to historic properties are taken into account.
(ii) If the Council declines
to comment, the agency official shall continue to comply with the requirements
of §§ 800.3 through 800.6 for the individual undertakings.
(6) Withdrawal of comment. If
the Council determines that the consideration of historic properties is not being
carried out in a manner consistent with the program comment, the Council may
withdraw the comment and the agency official shall comply with the requirements
of §§ 800.3 through 800.6 for the individual undertakings.
(f) Consultation with Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations when
developing program alternatives. Whenever an agency official proposes a program alternative pursuant to
paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section, the agency official shall ensure
that development of the program alternative includes appropriate
government-to-government consultation with affected Indian tribes and
consultation with affected Native Hawaiian organizations.
(1) Identifying affected Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations.
If any undertaking covered by a proposed program alternative has the potential
to affect historic properties on tribal lands, the agency official shall
identify and consult with the Indian tribes having jurisdiction over such
lands. If a proposed program
alternative has the potential to affect historic properties of religious and
cultural significance to an Indian tribe or a Native Hawaiian organization
which are located off tribal lands, the agency official shall identify those
Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations that might attach religious and
cultural significance to such properties and consult with them. When a proposed program alternative has
nationwide applicability, the agency official shall identify an appropriate
government to government consultation with Indian tribes and consult with
Native Hawaiian organizations in accordance with existing Executive orders,
Presidential memoranda and applicable provisions of law.
(2) Results of consultation. The agency official shall provide summaries of the views, along with copies of any written
comments, provided by affected Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations
to the Council as part of the documentation for the proposed program
alternative. The agency official and the
Council shall take those views into account in reaching a final decision on the
proposed program alternative.
§
800.15 Tribal, State, and local program
alternatives. (Reserved)
§
800.16 Definitions.
(a) Act means the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended, 16 U.S.C. 470-470w-6.
(b) Agency means agency as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551.
(c) Approval of the expenditure of funds means any final agency
decision authorizing or permitting the expenditure of Federal funds or
financial assistance on an undertaking, including any agency decision that may
be subject to an administrative appeal.
(d) Area of potential effects means the geographic area or areas within
which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the
character or use of historic
properties, if any such properties exist. The area of potential effects is influenced by the scale and nature of
an undertaking and may be different for different kinds of effects caused by
the undertaking.
(e) Comment means the findings and recommendations of the Council
formally provided in writing to the head of a Federal agency under section 106.
(f) Consultation means the process of seeking, discussing, and
considering the views of other participants, and, where feasible, seeking
agreement with them regarding matters arising in the section 106 process. The Secretary's “Standards and Guidelines
for Federal Agency Preservation Programs pursuant to the National Historic
Preservation Act” provide further guidance on consultation.
(g) Council means the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation or a
Council member or employee designated to act for the Council.
(h) Day or days means
calendar days.
(i) Effect means alteration to the characteristics of a historic
property qualifying it for inclusion in or eligibility for the National Register.
(j) Foreclosure means an action taken by an agency official that
effectively precludes the Council from providing comments which the agency
official can meaningfully consider prior to the approval of the undertaking.
(k) Head of the agency means the chief official of the Federal agency
responsible for all aspects of the agency's actions. If a State, local or tribal government has assumed or has been
delegated responsibility for section 106 compliance, the head of that unit of
government shall be considered the head of the agency.
(l)(1) Historic property means any prehistoric
or historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in, or
eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places maintained
by the Secretary of the Interior. This
term includes artifacts, records, and remains that are related to and located
within such properties. The term includes properties of traditional religious
and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and
that meet the National Register criteria.
(2) The term eligible for inclusion in the National
Register includes both properties formally determined as such in accordance
with regulations of the Secretary of the Interior and all other properties that
meet the National Register criteria.
(m) Indian tribe means an Indian tribe, band, nation, or other
organized group or community, including a native village, regional corporation
or village corporation, as those terms are defined in section 3 of the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602), which is recognized as eligible
for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians
because of their status as Indians.
(n) Local government means a city, county, parish, township, municipality,
borough, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State.
(o) Memorandum of agreement means the document that records the terms
and conditions agreed upon to resolve the adverse effects of an undertaking
upon historic properties.
(p) National Historic Landmark means a historic property that the
Secretary of the Interior has designated a National Historic Landmark.
(q) National Register means the National Register of Historic Places
maintained by the Secretary of the Interior.
(r) National Register criteria means the criteria established by the
Secretary of the Interior for use in evaluating the eligibility of properties
for the National Register (36 CFR part 60).
(s)(1)Native Hawaiian organization means any
organization which serves and represents the interests of Native Hawaiians; has
as a primary and stated purpose the provision of services to Native Hawaiians;
and has demonstrated expertise in aspects of historic preservation that are
significant to Native Hawaiians.
(2) Native Hawaiian means any individual who is a descendant of the
aboriginal people who, prior to 1778, occupied and exercised sovereignty in the
area that now constitutes the State of Hawaii.
(t) Programmatic agreement means a document that records the terms and
conditions agreed upon to resolve the potential adverse effects of a Federal
agency program, complex undertaking or other situations in accordance with §
800.14(b).
(u) Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior acting through the
Director of the National Park Service except where otherwise specified.
(v) State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) means the official
appointed or designated pursuant to section 101(b)(1) of the act to administer
the State historic preservation program or a representative designated to act
for the State historic preservation officer.
(w) Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO)means the tribal
official appointed by the tribe's chief governing authority or designated by a
tribal ordinance or preservation program who has assumed the responsibilities
of the SHPO for purposes of section 106 compliance on tribal lands in
accordance with section 101(d)(2) of the act.
(x) Tribal lands means all lands within the exterior boundaries of any
Indian reservation and all dependent Indian communities.
(y) Undertaking means a project, activity, or program funded in whole
or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal agency,
including those carried out by or on behalf of a Federal agency; those carried
out with Federal financial assistance; and those requiring a Federal permit,
license or approval.
(z) Senior policy official means the senior policy level official
designated by the head of the agency pursuant to section 3(e) of Executive
Order 13287.
Appendix
A to Part 800 -- Criteria for Council Involvement in Reviewing Individual
section 106 Cases
(a) Introduction. This appendix
sets forth the criteria that will be used by the Council to determine whether
to enter an individual section 106 review that it normally would not be involved
in.
(b) General policy. The Council
may choose to exercise its authorities under the section 106 regulations to
participate in an individual project pursuant to the following criteria. However, the Council will not always elect
to participate even though one or more of the criteria may be met.
(c) Specific criteria. The
Council is likely to enter the section 106 process at the steps specified in
the regulations in this part when an undertaking:
(1) Has substantial impacts on
important historic properties. This
may include adverse effects on properties that possess a national level of
significance or on properties that are of unusual or noteworthy importance or
are a rare property type; or adverse effects to large numbers of historic
properties, such as impacts to multiple properties within a historic district.
(2) Presents important questions of policy or interpretation. This may include questions about how the
Council's regulations are being applied or interpreted, including possible
foreclosure or anticipatory demolition situations; situations where the outcome
will set a precedent affecting Council policies or program goals; or the
development of programmatic agreements that alter the way the section 106
process is applied to a group or type of undertakings.
(3) Has the potential for presenting procedural problems. This may
include cases with substantial public controversy that is related to historic
preservation issues; with disputes among or about consulting parties which the
Council's involvement could help resolve; that are involved or likely to be
involved in litigation on the basis of section 106; or carried out by a Federal
agency, in a State or locality, or on tribal lands where the Council has
previously identified problems with section 106 compliance pursuant to §
800.9(d)(2).
(4) Presents issues of concern to Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian
organizations. This may include
cases where there have been concerns raised about the identification of,
evaluation of or assessment of effects on historic properties to which an
Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization attaches religious and cultural
significance; where an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization has
requested Council involvement to assist in the resolution of adverse effects;
or where there are questions relating to policy, interpretation or precedent
under section 106 or its relation to other authorities, such as the Native
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.
|